Abstract
Some endoscopic trainees find it difficult to manipulate an endoscope's controls, possibly due to small hand size. To assess this, a survey was mailed to all gastroenterology fellows in the US. Two hundred twenty-seven of 1,295 (17.5%) fellows responded. Median surgical glove size was 7.5. Ninety-three respondents (41.0%) considered their hand too small for a standard endoscope's handle; 176 (78.2%) felt that hand size affects the ability to learn endoscopy. Seventy-seven (34.2%) would use smaller handled endoscopes if available. Of the 38 respondents with glove sizes ≤6.5, 37 (97.4%) were female. These respondents were more likely to consider their hand too small (P < 0.001), want to use smaller handled endoscopes (P < 0.001), and feel that training programs should offer them (P = 0.009). These results suggest that a significant number of trainees, especially women, perceive that their hands are too small for standard endoscopes and believe that hand size plays a role in learning and performing endoscopy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1902-1909 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Digestive Diseases and Sciences |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Endoscopy
- Gastroenterology
- Hand size
- Medical ergonomics
- Physician attitudes
- Physician training
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The perception of gastroenterology fellows towards the relationship between hand size and endoscopic training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver