The peer review process: A primer for JNIS readers

Joshua A. Hirsch, Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi, Michael H. Lev, Italo Linfante, J. Mocco, Ansaar T. Rai, Pamela W. Schaefer, Robert W. Tarr

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Peer review of scientific articles submitted for publication has been such an integral component of innovation in science and medicine that participants (be they readers, reviewers, or editors) seldom consider its complexity. Not surprisingly, much has been written about scientific peer review. The aim of this report is to share some of the elements of that discourse with readers of the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e3-e6
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume9
Issue numbere1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The peer review process: A primer for JNIS readers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this