TY - JOUR
T1 - The path to biomarker-based diagnostic criteria for the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases
AU - for the Alzheimer Precision Medicine Initiative (APMI)
AU - Baldacci, Filippo
AU - Mazzucchi, Sonia
AU - Della Vecchia, Alessandra
AU - Giampietri, Linda
AU - Giannini, Nicola
AU - Koronyo-Hamaoui, Maya
AU - Ceravolo, Roberto
AU - Siciliano, Gabriele
AU - Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
AU - Elahi, Fanny M.
AU - Vergallo, Andrea
AU - Lista, Simone
AU - Giorgi, Filippo Sean
AU - Hampel, Harald
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/4/2
Y1 - 2020/4/2
N2 - Introduction: The postmortem examination still represents the reference standard for detecting the pathological nature of chronic neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). This approach displays intrinsic conceptual limitations since NDD represent a dynamic spectrum of partially overlapping phenotypes, shared pathomechanistic alterations that often give rise to mixed pathologies. Areas covered: We scrutinized the international clinical diagnostic criteria of NDD and the literature to provide a roadmap toward a biomarker-based classification of the NDD spectrum. A few pathophysiological biomarkers have been established for NDD. These are time-consuming, invasive, and not suitable for preclinical detection. Candidate screening biomarkers are gaining momentum. Blood neurofilament light-chain represents a robust first-line tool to detect neurodegeneration tout court and serum progranulin helps detect genetic frontotemporal dementia. Ultrasensitive assays and retinal scans may identify Aβ pathology early, in blood and the eye, respectively. Ultrasound also represents a minimally invasive option to investigate the substantia nigra. Protein misfolding amplification assays may accurately detect α-synuclein in biofluids. Expert opinion: Data-driven strategies using quantitative rather than categorical variables may be more reliable for quantification of contributions from pathophysiological mechanisms and their spatial-temporal evolution. A systems biology approach is suitable to untangle the dynamics triggering loss of proteostasis, driving neurodegeneration and clinical evolution.
AB - Introduction: The postmortem examination still represents the reference standard for detecting the pathological nature of chronic neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). This approach displays intrinsic conceptual limitations since NDD represent a dynamic spectrum of partially overlapping phenotypes, shared pathomechanistic alterations that often give rise to mixed pathologies. Areas covered: We scrutinized the international clinical diagnostic criteria of NDD and the literature to provide a roadmap toward a biomarker-based classification of the NDD spectrum. A few pathophysiological biomarkers have been established for NDD. These are time-consuming, invasive, and not suitable for preclinical detection. Candidate screening biomarkers are gaining momentum. Blood neurofilament light-chain represents a robust first-line tool to detect neurodegeneration tout court and serum progranulin helps detect genetic frontotemporal dementia. Ultrasensitive assays and retinal scans may identify Aβ pathology early, in blood and the eye, respectively. Ultrasound also represents a minimally invasive option to investigate the substantia nigra. Protein misfolding amplification assays may accurately detect α-synuclein in biofluids. Expert opinion: Data-driven strategies using quantitative rather than categorical variables may be more reliable for quantification of contributions from pathophysiological mechanisms and their spatial-temporal evolution. A systems biology approach is suitable to untangle the dynamics triggering loss of proteostasis, driving neurodegeneration and clinical evolution.
KW - Alzheimer’s disease
KW - Parkinson disease
KW - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
KW - biomarkers
KW - cerebral amyloid angiopathy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080124122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14737159.2020.1731306
DO - 10.1080/14737159.2020.1731306
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32066283
AN - SCOPUS:85080124122
SN - 1473-7159
VL - 20
SP - 421
EP - 441
JO - Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
IS - 4
ER -