TY - JOUR
T1 - The importance of surgical resection in the management of rectal sarcoma
T2 - A national cancer database analysis of 133 cases
AU - Freund, Michael R.
AU - Emile, Sameh Hany
AU - Horesh, Nir
AU - Garoufalia, Zoe
AU - Gefen, Rachel
AU - Wexner, Steven D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background and purpose: Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors. Results: 133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2–21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001) Conclusions: RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS.
AB - Background and purpose: Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors. Results: 133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2–21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001) Conclusions: RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS.
KW - NCDB
KW - National cancer database
KW - Overall survival
KW - Rectal sarcoma
KW - Surgical resection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140986940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140986940
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 49
SP - 647
EP - 654
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -