The Importance of Genetics Experts in Optimizing Genetic Test Orders through Prospective and Retrospective Reviews

M. Edye Conway, Cassidi Dailey Kalejta, Darci L. Sternen, Ila R. Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate the impact of genetics specialists on identifying test order errors and improving reimbursement for genetic testing. Methods: Forty-four cases in which whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed but not reimbursed were reviewed by a genetic counselor through simulated prospective and retrospective reviews. Results: Fifty-two percent of WES requests were ordered by nongenetics providers. Retrospective review revealed that 50% of cases were denied because of contractual constraints on billing. If review by a genetic counselor had occurred in real time, modifications or cancellations would have been recommended in 82% of the cases. Conclusions: A laboratory stewardship program involving genetics experts identified test order errors and opportunities for improved reimbursement and cost savings. Significant variables affected reimbursement, including inpatient status, payer criteria, and ordering provider specialty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-547
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume153
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Laboratory stewardship
  • WES
  • eimbursement
  • enetic testing
  • enetics
  • hole exome sequencing
  • nsurance
  • reauthorization
  • rior authorization
  • tilization management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Importance of Genetics Experts in Optimizing Genetic Test Orders through Prospective and Retrospective Reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this