TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates
AU - Fairbrother, Gerry
AU - Hanson, Karla L.
AU - Friedman, Stephen
AU - Butts, Gary C.
PY - 1999/2
Y1 - 1999/2
N2 - Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on immunization coverage of 3 incentives for physicians - a cash bonus for practice-wide increases, enhanced fee for service, and feedback. Methods. Incentives were applied at 4-month intervals over 1 year among 60 inner-city office-based pediatricians. At each interval, charts of 50 randomly selected children between 3 and 35 months of age were reviewed per physician. Results. The percentage of children who were up to date for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b; polio; and measles-mumps- rubella immunization in the study's bonus group improved by 25.3 percentage points (P < .01). No significant changes occurred in the other groups. However, percentage of immunizations received outside the participating practice also increased significantly in the bonus group (P < .0.1). Levels of missed opportunities to immunize were high in all groups and did hot change over time. Physicians' knowledge of contraindications was low. Conclusions: Bonuses sharply and rapidly increased immunization coverage in medical records. However, much of the increase was the result of better documentation. A bonus is a powerful incentive, but more structure or education may be necessary to achieve the desired results.
AB - Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on immunization coverage of 3 incentives for physicians - a cash bonus for practice-wide increases, enhanced fee for service, and feedback. Methods. Incentives were applied at 4-month intervals over 1 year among 60 inner-city office-based pediatricians. At each interval, charts of 50 randomly selected children between 3 and 35 months of age were reviewed per physician. Results. The percentage of children who were up to date for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b; polio; and measles-mumps- rubella immunization in the study's bonus group improved by 25.3 percentage points (P < .01). No significant changes occurred in the other groups. However, percentage of immunizations received outside the participating practice also increased significantly in the bonus group (P < .0.1). Levels of missed opportunities to immunize were high in all groups and did hot change over time. Physicians' knowledge of contraindications was low. Conclusions: Bonuses sharply and rapidly increased immunization coverage in medical records. However, much of the increase was the result of better documentation. A bonus is a powerful incentive, but more structure or education may be necessary to achieve the desired results.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0032978484
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.89.2.171
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.89.2.171
M3 - Article
C2 - 9949744
AN - SCOPUS:0032978484
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 89
SP - 171
EP - 175
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
IS - 2
ER -