@article{6605a46f67a44c5bbf5a92b9c6eac2b6,
title = "The human visual evoked potential: Analysis of components due to elementary and complex aspects of form",
abstract = "The visual evoked potential (VEP) elicited by alternation between isodipole visual textures may be separated into an asymmetric and a symmetric part. The asymmetric part reflects processing of complex attributes of form. The spatial and temporal dependence of this response is used to evaluate models for the generation of this response. The symmetric part appears to reflect processing of local luminance and contrast changes. The relation of these components to the VEP elicited by contrast reversal, contrast modulation, and the windmill-dartboard stimulus is discussed.",
keywords = "Feature analysis, Human, Parallel visual processing, Systems analysis, Visual evoked potential",
author = "Victor, {Jonathan D.} and Vance Zemon",
note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgement-We thank Mary Come, Dr Jim Gordon, Yvonne Holland, Norman Milkman, MichelangelRoo ssettoa,n d Gary Schickf or theire xcellent technical assistance.W e thank Drs Floyd Ratliff and Robert Shapley for their many helpful suggestionsT. he time willingly spentb y memberso f the BiophysicsL abora-tory as subjectsi s gratefullya ppreciatedT. his work was supportedin part by grantsE Y 188,E Y2439,E Y5366,a nd NS877 from the National Instituteso f Health, The Harry Frank GuggenheimF oundation, and The Klingenstein Fund. J.V. is a Hartford Fellow and receiveda dditional support from The M&night Foundation.",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(85)90006-9",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1829--1842",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",
number = "12",
}