The government and the inguinal hernia

D. Friedman, A. Schwartzbard, F. T. Velcek, D. H. Klotz, P. K. Kottmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our review of the incidence of inguinal hernias in children based on socioeconomic differences and their risk of incarceration with its subsequent complications, was prompted by a governmental decision to disallow elective herniorrhaphy in children over 1 yr of age. The review showed the following: The risk of incarceration, the failure of preoperative reduction and the potential gonadal injury is more than three times as high in the poor child, usually covered by Medicaid. Since operative and postoperative complications increase proportional to the incidence of incarceration, the denial of an elective herniorrhaphy endangers the life of a child. Since the increased hospitalization after incarceration also increases the financial expenditure, this rule is not only medically but also economically unsound. This review suggests that unilateral governmental health care decisions, especially those aimed at cost containment, should be carefully scrutinized to determine what price not only the society, but the patient has to pay for the "cost containment." We feel that the price of the denial of a herniorrhaphy is too high.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-359
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1979

Keywords

  • Inguinal hernia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The government and the inguinal hernia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this