TY - JOUR
T1 - The goldilocks zone of type I IFNs
T2 - Lessons from human genetics
AU - Taft, Justin
AU - Bogunovic, Dusan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
PY - 2018/12/15
Y1 - 2018/12/15
N2 - Type I IFNs (IFN-Is) are powerful cytokines. They provide remarkable protection against viral infections, but their indiscriminate production causes severe selfinflicted damage that can be lethal, particularly in early development. In humans, inappropriately high IFN-I levels caused by defects in the regulatory mechanisms that control IFN-I production and response result in clinical conditions known as type I interferonopathies. In essence, type I interferonopathies define the upper limit of safe, IFN-related inflammation in vivo. Conversely, the loss of IFN-I responsiveness increases susceptibility to viral infections, but, surprisingly, most affected individuals survive despite these inborn errors of immunity. These findings suggest that too much IFN-I early in life is toxic, but that insensitivity to IFN-I is perhaps not the death sentence it was initially thought to be. Human genetic analyses have suggested that seemingly insignificant levels of IFN-regulated gene activity may be sufficient for most of the antiviral defenses used by humans in natura. The Journ Al of Immunology, 2018, 201: 3479-3485.
AB - Type I IFNs (IFN-Is) are powerful cytokines. They provide remarkable protection against viral infections, but their indiscriminate production causes severe selfinflicted damage that can be lethal, particularly in early development. In humans, inappropriately high IFN-I levels caused by defects in the regulatory mechanisms that control IFN-I production and response result in clinical conditions known as type I interferonopathies. In essence, type I interferonopathies define the upper limit of safe, IFN-related inflammation in vivo. Conversely, the loss of IFN-I responsiveness increases susceptibility to viral infections, but, surprisingly, most affected individuals survive despite these inborn errors of immunity. These findings suggest that too much IFN-I early in life is toxic, but that insensitivity to IFN-I is perhaps not the death sentence it was initially thought to be. Human genetic analyses have suggested that seemingly insignificant levels of IFN-regulated gene activity may be sufficient for most of the antiviral defenses used by humans in natura. The Journ Al of Immunology, 2018, 201: 3479-3485.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058387621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4049/jimmunol.1800764
DO - 10.4049/jimmunol.1800764
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30530500
AN - SCOPUS:85058387621
SN - 0022-1767
VL - 201
SP - 3479
EP - 3485
JO - Journal of Immunology
JF - Journal of Immunology
IS - 12
ER -