The genetics of breast cancer risk in the post-genome era: Thoughts on study design to move past BRCA and towards clinical relevance

Andrew D. Skol, Mark M. Sasaki, Kenan Onel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

More than 12 % of women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. Although there have been tremendous advances in elucidating genetic risk factors underlying both familial and sporadic breast cancer, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer etiology remains unknown. The discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 over 20 years ago remains the seminal event in the field and has paved the way for the discovery of other high-penetrance susceptibility genes by linkage analysis. The advent of genome-wide association studies made possible the next wave of discoveries, in which over 80 low-penetrance and moderate-penetrance variants were identified. Although these studies were highly successful at discovering variants associated with both familial and sporadic breast cancer, the variants identified to date explain only 50 % of the heritability of breast cancer. In this review, we look back at the investigative strategies that have led to our current understanding of breast cancer genetics, consider the challenges of performing association studies in heterogeneous complex diseases such as breast cancer, and look ahead toward the types of study designs that may lead to the identification of the genetic variation accounting for the remaining missing heritability.

Original languageEnglish
Article number99
JournalBreast Cancer Research
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Genetics
  • Genome-wide association study
  • Genomics
  • Linkage analysis
  • Next-generation sequencing
  • Penetrance
  • Predisposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The genetics of breast cancer risk in the post-genome era: Thoughts on study design to move past BRCA and towards clinical relevance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this