TY - JOUR
T1 - The Extent of Mechanical Esophageal Deviation to Avoid Esophageal Heating During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
AU - Palaniswamy, Chandrasekar
AU - Koruth, Jacob S.
AU - Mittnacht, Alexander J.
AU - Miller, Marc A.
AU - Choudry, Subbarao
AU - Bhardwaj, Rahul
AU - Sharma, Dinesh
AU - Willner, Jonathan M.
AU - Balulad, Sujata S.
AU - Verghese, Elizabeth
AU - Syros, Georgios
AU - Singh, Anurag
AU - Dukkipati, Srinivas R.
AU - Reddy, Vivek Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Objectives This study sought to determine the extent of lateral esophageal displacement required during mechanical esophageal deviation (MED) and to eliminate luminal esophageal temperature elevation (LETElev) during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Background MED is a conceptually attractive strategy of minimizing esophageal injury while allowing uninterrupted energy delivery along the posterior left atrium during PV isolation. Methods MED was performed using a malleable metal stylet within a plastic tube placed within the esophagus. Barium was instilled to characterize the trailing esophageal edge. For each MED attempt, the MEDEffective, defined as the distance from the trailing esophageal edge-to-ablation line, was correlated to occurrences of LETElev. Results In 114 consecutive patients/221 PV pairs undergoing MED (age 62.1 ± 11 years, 75% men, 62%/38% paroxysmal/persistent AF), esophageal stretching invariably occurred such that the esophageal edge trailed behind the plastic tube. MEDEffective distances of 0 mm to 10 mm, 10 mm to 15 mm, 15 mm to 20 mm or >20 mm were achieved in 60 (27.1%), 64 (29%), 48 (21.7%), and 49 (22.2%) attempts, respectively. Overall, LET elevation >38°C occurred in 81 of 221 (36.7%) PV pairs. The incidence of LETElev among the 4 groups was 73.3%, 35.9%, 25%, and 4.1%, respectively. MEDEffective distances were 9.1 ± 6.5 mm and 18 ± 7.6 mm in patients with and without LETElev, respectively (p < 0.0001). Three patients (2.6%) experienced clinically significant MED-related trauma, albeit only with a stiffer stylet. Conclusions Mechanical esophageal deviation >20 mm from the PV ablation line prevents significant esophageal heating during PV isolation, but this level of displacement was difficult to safely achieve with this off-the-shelf mechanical stylet approach.
AB - Objectives This study sought to determine the extent of lateral esophageal displacement required during mechanical esophageal deviation (MED) and to eliminate luminal esophageal temperature elevation (LETElev) during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Background MED is a conceptually attractive strategy of minimizing esophageal injury while allowing uninterrupted energy delivery along the posterior left atrium during PV isolation. Methods MED was performed using a malleable metal stylet within a plastic tube placed within the esophagus. Barium was instilled to characterize the trailing esophageal edge. For each MED attempt, the MEDEffective, defined as the distance from the trailing esophageal edge-to-ablation line, was correlated to occurrences of LETElev. Results In 114 consecutive patients/221 PV pairs undergoing MED (age 62.1 ± 11 years, 75% men, 62%/38% paroxysmal/persistent AF), esophageal stretching invariably occurred such that the esophageal edge trailed behind the plastic tube. MEDEffective distances of 0 mm to 10 mm, 10 mm to 15 mm, 15 mm to 20 mm or >20 mm were achieved in 60 (27.1%), 64 (29%), 48 (21.7%), and 49 (22.2%) attempts, respectively. Overall, LET elevation >38°C occurred in 81 of 221 (36.7%) PV pairs. The incidence of LETElev among the 4 groups was 73.3%, 35.9%, 25%, and 4.1%, respectively. MEDEffective distances were 9.1 ± 6.5 mm and 18 ± 7.6 mm in patients with and without LETElev, respectively (p < 0.0001). Three patients (2.6%) experienced clinically significant MED-related trauma, albeit only with a stiffer stylet. Conclusions Mechanical esophageal deviation >20 mm from the PV ablation line prevents significant esophageal heating during PV isolation, but this level of displacement was difficult to safely achieve with this off-the-shelf mechanical stylet approach.
KW - esophageal deviation
KW - esophageal protection
KW - stylet
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028547606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.03.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.03.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 29759498
AN - SCOPUS:85028547606
SN - 2405-5018
VL - 3
SP - 1146
EP - 1154
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 10
ER -