TY - JOUR
T1 - The Efficacy of Behavioral Interventions for Cancer Treatment-Related Side Effects
AU - Mundy, Elizabeth A.
AU - DuHamel, Katherine N.
AU - Montgomery, Guy H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by a Postdoctoral Training Award from the National Cancer Institute (CA81137). Guy Montgomery’s work was supported by grant from the National Cancer Institute (#CA87021-01). Katherine DuHamel’s work was supported by the American Cancer Society, grant #RPG99271-01, and a grant from the U.S. Army Medical Research and material Command under Award Number DAMD17-99-1-9304. The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other documentation.
PY - 2003/10
Y1 - 2003/10
N2 - The use of increasingly aggressive methods of cancer treatment (e.g., cytotoxic doses of chemotherapy and total body irradiation) has resulted in the need for more effective management of pain, nausea, and other aversive side effects. One of the most promising approaches is nonpharmacologic intervention based on behavioral research and theory. The purpose of this article is to review the efficacy of behavioral intervention methods in controlling aversive side effects of cancer treatments. Sixty-seven published studies were identified for review. Results indicated that: (1) behavioral intervention can effectively control anticipatory nausea and vomiting in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. However, evidence for the efficacy of behavioral intervention to control post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting is mixed; (2) behavioral intervention integrating several behavioral techniques can decrease levels of anxiety and distress associated with invasive treatments and cancer diagnosis; and (3) although a variety of behavioral methods have been shown to reduce acute treatment-related pain, not all behavioral techniques are equally effective. Hypnotic-like methods involving relaxation, suggestion, and imagery appear to have the greatest impact on cancer-related pain management. The use of behavioral theory and techniques has an important place in the care of patients undergoing invasive cancer treatments.
AB - The use of increasingly aggressive methods of cancer treatment (e.g., cytotoxic doses of chemotherapy and total body irradiation) has resulted in the need for more effective management of pain, nausea, and other aversive side effects. One of the most promising approaches is nonpharmacologic intervention based on behavioral research and theory. The purpose of this article is to review the efficacy of behavioral intervention methods in controlling aversive side effects of cancer treatments. Sixty-seven published studies were identified for review. Results indicated that: (1) behavioral intervention can effectively control anticipatory nausea and vomiting in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. However, evidence for the efficacy of behavioral intervention to control post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting is mixed; (2) behavioral intervention integrating several behavioral techniques can decrease levels of anxiety and distress associated with invasive treatments and cancer diagnosis; and (3) although a variety of behavioral methods have been shown to reduce acute treatment-related pain, not all behavioral techniques are equally effective. Hypnotic-like methods involving relaxation, suggestion, and imagery appear to have the greatest impact on cancer-related pain management. The use of behavioral theory and techniques has an important place in the care of patients undergoing invasive cancer treatments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344676393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
C2 - 14613052
AN - SCOPUS:0344676393
SN - 1084-3612
VL - 8
SP - 253
EP - 275
JO - Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry
JF - Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry
IS - 4
ER -