TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on metal spine implants
AU - Lyons, Christopher J.
AU - Betz, Randal R.
AU - Mesgarzadeh, Mamed
AU - Revesz, George
AU - Bonakdarpour, Akbar
AU - Clancy, Michael
PY - 1989/7
Y1 - 1989/7
N2 - In Part 1 of this study, the forces and torques exerted on metallic spine implants by a 0.3-T magnetic field were evaluated using a cantilever system sensitive to forces as low as 250 mg and torques as low as 4 g/cm. Results indicated that the 0.3-T magnification field did not cause forces or torques that could be measured within this range. It is concluded that patients with spine implants may safely undergo magnetic resonance scanning. In Part 2, the magnetic resonance scans from 33 patients (61 studies) then were reviewed to determine which, if any, parameters could be adjusted to minimize artifact. Magnetic power, slice thickness, plane of scan, and pulse sequence were considered. Plane of scan was found to be the most significant parameter In achieving useful studies, with the sagittal plane being the preferred orientation. Scans of patients who had posterior wiring were more likely to be useful, while scans of patients with spinal rods usually showed a large amount of artifact.
AB - In Part 1 of this study, the forces and torques exerted on metallic spine implants by a 0.3-T magnetic field were evaluated using a cantilever system sensitive to forces as low as 250 mg and torques as low as 4 g/cm. Results indicated that the 0.3-T magnification field did not cause forces or torques that could be measured within this range. It is concluded that patients with spine implants may safely undergo magnetic resonance scanning. In Part 2, the magnetic resonance scans from 33 patients (61 studies) then were reviewed to determine which, if any, parameters could be adjusted to minimize artifact. Magnetic power, slice thickness, plane of scan, and pulse sequence were considered. Plane of scan was found to be the most significant parameter In achieving useful studies, with the sagittal plane being the preferred orientation. Scans of patients who had posterior wiring were more likely to be useful, while scans of patients with spinal rods usually showed a large amount of artifact.
KW - Artifact reduction
KW - Force induction
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Parameters for studies
KW - Spinal internal fixation devices
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0024362801
U2 - 10.1097/00007632-198907000-00004
DO - 10.1097/00007632-198907000-00004
M3 - Article
C2 - 2772713
AN - SCOPUS:0024362801
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 14
SP - 670
EP - 672
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 7
ER -