The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus

Chin Hur, Sung Eun Choi, Joel H. Rubenstein, Chung Yin Kong, Norman S. Nishioka, Dawn T. Provenzale, John M. Inadomi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

137 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), but its effects in patients without dysplasia are debatable. We analyzed the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of RFA for the management of BE. METHODS: We constructed a decision analytic Markov model. We conducted separate analyses of hypothetical cohorts of patients with BE with dysplasia (HGD or low-grade [LGD]) and without dysplasia. In the analysis of the group with HGD, we compared results of initial RFA with endoscopic surveillance with surgery when cancer was detected. In analyzing the group with LGD or no dysplasia, we compared 3 strategies: endoscopic surveillance with surgery when cancer was detected (S1), endoscopic surveillance with RFA when HGD was detected (S2), and initial RFA followed by endoscopic surveillance (S3). RESULTS: Among patients with HGD, initial RFA was more effective and less costly than endoscopic surveillance. Among patients with LGD, when S3 was compared with S2, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $18,231/quality-adjusted life-year, assuming an annual rate of progression rate from LGD to EAC of 0.5%/year. For patients without dysplasia, S2 was more effective and less costly than S1. In a comparison of S3 with S2, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $205,500, $124,796, and $118,338/quality- adjusted life-year using annual rates of progression of no dysplasia to EAC of 0.12%, 0.33%, or 0.5% per year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By using updated data, initial RFA might not be cost effective for patients with BE without dysplasia, within the range of plausible rates of progression of BE to EAC, and be prohibitively expensive, from a policy perspective. RFA might be cost effective for confirmed and stable LGD. Initial RFA is more effective and less costly than endoscopic surveillance in HGD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-575
Number of pages9
JournalGastroenterology
Volume143
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Barrett's Esophagus
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
  • Radiofrequency Ablation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this