TY - JOUR
T1 - The clinical significance of exercise-induced left ventricular wall motion abnormality occurring at a low heart rate
AU - Kimchi, Asher
AU - Rozanski, Alan
AU - Fletcher, Caryl
AU - Maddahi, Jamshid
AU - Swan, H. J.C.
AU - Berman, Daniel S.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Univeristy of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine. Supported in part hy National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Grant 5-T32-HLO 7380-04, NIH SCOR Grant 17651, and a grant-in-aid to Dr. Rozanski from The American Heart Association, Greater Los Angeles Affiliate. Received for publication Aug. 21, 1986; accepted April 22, 1987. Reprint requests: Asher Kimchi, M.D., Cedars-Sinai Medical Towers, 8635 West Third St., Suite 355W, Los Angeles, CA 90048.
PY - 1987/10
Y1 - 1987/10
N2 - We studied the relationship between the heart rate at the time of onset of exercise-induced wall motion abnormality and the severity of coronary artery disease in 89 patients who underwent exercise oquilibrium radionuclide ventriculography as part of their svaluation for coronary artery disease. Segmental wall motion was scored with a five-point system (3 = normal; -1 = dyskinesis); a decrease of one score defined the onset of wall motion abnormality. The onset of wall motion abnormality at ≤70% of maximal predicted heart rate had 100% predictive accuracy for coronary artery disease and higher sensitivity than the onset of ischemic ST segment depression at similar heart rate during exercise: 36% (25 of 69 patients with coronary disease) vs 19% (13 of 69 pationts), p = 0.01. Wall motion abnormality occurring at ≤70% of maximal predicted heart rate was present in 49% of patients (23 of 47) with critical stenosis (≥90% luminal diameter narrowing), and in only 5% of patients (2 of 42) without such severe stenosis, p < 0.001. The sensitivity of exercise-induced wall motion abnormality occurring at a low heart rate for the presence of severe coronary artery disease was similar to that of a deterioration in wall motion by more than two scores during exercise (49% vs 53%) or an absolute decrease of ≥5% in exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (49% vs 45%). However, the early onset of wall motion abnormality was more specific for the identification of patients with critical stenosis than deterioration of exercise wall motion by two or more scores (95% vs 71%, p < 0.01) and decrease in ejection fraction (95% vs 79%, p < 0.05). Therefore, the onset of exercise-induced wall motion abnormality at ≤70% maximal predicted heart rate is a relatively infrequent but strong predictor of coronary artery stenosis, implies severe disease, and is superior to exercise ECG in predicting disease presence and severity.
AB - We studied the relationship between the heart rate at the time of onset of exercise-induced wall motion abnormality and the severity of coronary artery disease in 89 patients who underwent exercise oquilibrium radionuclide ventriculography as part of their svaluation for coronary artery disease. Segmental wall motion was scored with a five-point system (3 = normal; -1 = dyskinesis); a decrease of one score defined the onset of wall motion abnormality. The onset of wall motion abnormality at ≤70% of maximal predicted heart rate had 100% predictive accuracy for coronary artery disease and higher sensitivity than the onset of ischemic ST segment depression at similar heart rate during exercise: 36% (25 of 69 patients with coronary disease) vs 19% (13 of 69 pationts), p = 0.01. Wall motion abnormality occurring at ≤70% of maximal predicted heart rate was present in 49% of patients (23 of 47) with critical stenosis (≥90% luminal diameter narrowing), and in only 5% of patients (2 of 42) without such severe stenosis, p < 0.001. The sensitivity of exercise-induced wall motion abnormality occurring at a low heart rate for the presence of severe coronary artery disease was similar to that of a deterioration in wall motion by more than two scores during exercise (49% vs 53%) or an absolute decrease of ≥5% in exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (49% vs 45%). However, the early onset of wall motion abnormality was more specific for the identification of patients with critical stenosis than deterioration of exercise wall motion by two or more scores (95% vs 71%, p < 0.01) and decrease in ejection fraction (95% vs 79%, p < 0.05). Therefore, the onset of exercise-induced wall motion abnormality at ≤70% maximal predicted heart rate is a relatively infrequent but strong predictor of coronary artery stenosis, implies severe disease, and is superior to exercise ECG in predicting disease presence and severity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023265054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90781-2
DO - 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90781-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 3661362
AN - SCOPUS:0023265054
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 114
SP - 724
EP - 730
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 4 PART 1
ER -