The clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents: A critical assessment of "oculostenotic" reintervention in patients with intermediate lesions

  • Takahiro Uchida
  • , Jeffrey Popma
  • , Gregg W. Stone
  • , Stephen G. Ellis
  • , Mark A. Turco
  • , John A. Ormiston
  • , Toshiya Muramatsu
  • , Masato Nakamura
  • , Shinsgbre Nanto
  • , Hiroyoshi Yokoi
  • , Donald S. Baim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

94 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to study the long-term clinical effects of routine angiographic follow-up and related reintervention after drug-eluting stenting. Background: Prior stent trials have shown that protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up increases repeat interventions compared with clinical follow-up alone. The long-term clinical impact of this practice is unknown. Methods: Long-term outcomes of patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up in 3 large-scale TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) trials were compared with patients assigned to clinical follow-up alone, in a propensity score-adjusted patient-level meta-analysis. Outcomes were also compared in patients with treated versus untreated nonischemic intermediate lesions (quantitative angiographic stenosis between <40% and <70%) detected at angiographic follow-up. Results: Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates at 5 years were significantly higher in the angiographic compared with clinical follow-up cohort (18.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). This was due to more frequent treatment of intermediate lesions, but there was no associated reduction in rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (8.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.93). Of patients with nonischemic intermediate lesions, 17% who were not revascularized at the time of angiographic follow-up had a subsequent TLR, whereas 7% of patients who had TLR at this follow-up angiogram required additional revascularization during long-term follow-up. Conclusions: A strategy of routine angiographic follow-up increases oculostenotic revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions without affecting subsequent rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction, and TLR was not required in 83% of those lesions. A conservative approach, in which repeat angiography is limited to patients with recurrent ischemia or progressive symptoms, minimizes repeat revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions and optimizes long-term event-free survival after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-411
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • drug-eluting stent
  • intermediate lesions
  • meta-analysis
  • oculostenotic reflex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents: A critical assessment of "oculostenotic" reintervention in patients with intermediate lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this