TY - JOUR
T1 - The Clinical Efficacy for Two-Level Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
AU - Singh, Jaspal R.
AU - Cardozo, Eliana
AU - Christolias, George C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - Background Epidural steroid injections have been used in combination with other modalities for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. The literature has shown that 1-level lumbar fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are effective in decreasing pain and morbidity; however, the efficacy of 2-level TFESIs has not been investigated, although they are performed by many practitioners in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Objectives To assess the clinical effectiveness of 2-level TFESIs in patients with unilateral, single-level lumbar radicular pain. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed based on disk herniation location. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Outpatient physiatry pain practice. Patients A total of 721 patients were included in this study having undergone a two-level transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Methods The study group included patients who underwent a 2-level lumbar TFESI. Patients presented for lumbar radicular pain as the result of disk herniation with or without radiculopathy and were scheduled to receive a lumbar TFESI at L3 or below. Of this group, only those that underwent a 2-level TFESIs were included in the study, and data analysis was carried out on this group. Main Outcome Measures Subjects were assessed with a pain numerical rating scale (NRS 0-10) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before TFESI and at 2-week and 2-month follow-up. Responders were defined as greater that 50% reduction in NRS or greater than 40% reduction in ODI. Results A total of 57.7% of patients were responders in terms of NRS (P < .05, confidence interval 53.6%-61.9%) and 51.7% responded in ODI at 2-month follow-up (P < .05 [confidence interval 47.5%-55.9%]). In addition, patients with complete pain relief (defined as 0/10 on NRS) were noted at both 2-week (n = 239, 33%) and 2-month (n = 130, 18%) follow-up. In subgroup analysis, the paracentral/subarticular disk group had an increased number of responders, 66.0% in NRS and 64.0% in ODI at 2-month follow-up (P < .05). Conclusions Two-level TFESIs are effective in the management of radicular pain, but more research is needed to evaluate the utility of this treatment compared with single-level TFESI. Our study showed a greater improvement in pain and function as a result of 2-level TFESIs in the setting of paracentral/subarticular disk herniations.
AB - Background Epidural steroid injections have been used in combination with other modalities for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. The literature has shown that 1-level lumbar fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are effective in decreasing pain and morbidity; however, the efficacy of 2-level TFESIs has not been investigated, although they are performed by many practitioners in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Objectives To assess the clinical effectiveness of 2-level TFESIs in patients with unilateral, single-level lumbar radicular pain. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed based on disk herniation location. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Outpatient physiatry pain practice. Patients A total of 721 patients were included in this study having undergone a two-level transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Methods The study group included patients who underwent a 2-level lumbar TFESI. Patients presented for lumbar radicular pain as the result of disk herniation with or without radiculopathy and were scheduled to receive a lumbar TFESI at L3 or below. Of this group, only those that underwent a 2-level TFESIs were included in the study, and data analysis was carried out on this group. Main Outcome Measures Subjects were assessed with a pain numerical rating scale (NRS 0-10) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before TFESI and at 2-week and 2-month follow-up. Responders were defined as greater that 50% reduction in NRS or greater than 40% reduction in ODI. Results A total of 57.7% of patients were responders in terms of NRS (P < .05, confidence interval 53.6%-61.9%) and 51.7% responded in ODI at 2-month follow-up (P < .05 [confidence interval 47.5%-55.9%]). In addition, patients with complete pain relief (defined as 0/10 on NRS) were noted at both 2-week (n = 239, 33%) and 2-month (n = 130, 18%) follow-up. In subgroup analysis, the paracentral/subarticular disk group had an increased number of responders, 66.0% in NRS and 64.0% in ODI at 2-month follow-up (P < .05). Conclusions Two-level TFESIs are effective in the management of radicular pain, but more research is needed to evaluate the utility of this treatment compared with single-level TFESI. Our study showed a greater improvement in pain and function as a result of 2-level TFESIs in the setting of paracentral/subarticular disk herniations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001817269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.030
DO - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 27614187
AN - SCOPUS:85001817269
SN - 1934-1482
VL - 9
SP - 377
EP - 382
JO - PM and R
JF - PM and R
IS - 4
ER -