Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The challenge of defining “ultra-high-risk” neuroblastoma

  • Daniel A. Morgenstern
  • , Rochelle Bagatell
  • , Susan L. Cohn
  • , Michael D. Hogarty
  • , John M. Maris
  • , Lucas Moreno
  • , Julie R. Park
  • , Andrew D. Pearson
  • , Gudrun Schleiermacher
  • , Dominique Valteau-Couanet
  • , Wendy B. London
  • , Meredith S. Irwin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Given the biological and clinical heterogeneity of neuroblastoma, risk stratification is vital to determining appropriate treatment. Historically, most patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) have been treated uniformly without further stratification. Attempts have been made to identify factors that can be used to risk stratify these patients and to characterize an “ultra-high-risk” (UHR) subpopulation with particularly poor outcome. However, among published data, there is a lack of consensus in the definition of the UHR population and heterogeneity in the endpoints and statistical methods used. This review summarizes our current understanding of stratification of HR-NBL and discusses the complex issues in defining UHR neuroblastoma.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere27556
JournalPediatric Blood and Cancer
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • biomarkers
  • high-risk
  • neuroblastoma
  • risk stratification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge of defining “ultra-high-risk” neuroblastoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this