TY - JOUR
T1 - The CARE guidelines
T2 - Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development
AU - the CARE Group
AU - Gagnier, Joel J.
AU - Kienle, Gunver
AU - Altman, Douglas G.
AU - Moher, David
AU - Sox, Harold
AU - Riley, David
AU - Allaire, Alyshia
AU - Aronson, Jeffrey
AU - Hanaway, Patrick
AU - Hayes, Carolyn
AU - Carpenter, James
AU - Kaszkin-Bettag, Marietta
AU - Kidd, Michael
AU - Kiene, Helmut
AU - Kienle, Gunver
AU - Kligler, Ben
AU - Knutson, Lori
AU - Koch, Christian
AU - Milgate, Karen
AU - Mittelman, Michele
AU - Oltean, Hanna
AU - Plotnikoff, Greg
AU - Rison, Richard Alan
AU - Sethi, Anil
AU - Shamseer, Larissa
AU - Smith, Richard
AU - Tugwell, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
Joel Gagnier, University of Michigan, and David Riley, Global Advances in Health and Medicine, organized this consensus-based guideline-development project. The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Office of the Vice-President of Research at the University of Michigan, and Global Advances in Health and Medicine® provided funding for this project. David Moher is funded through a University of Ottawa Research Chair. Funding support was used to reimburse the travel-related expenses of conference attendees. There were no honoraria. The volunteer steering committee consisted of Joel J. Gagnier, Gunver Kienle, David Moher, and David Riley. There are no conflicts of interest to report.
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Background: A case report is a narrative that describes, for medical, scientific, or educational purposes, a medical problem experienced by one or more patients. Case reports written without guidance from reporting standards are insufficiently rigorous to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. Primary Objective. Develop, disseminate, and implement systematic reporting guidelines for case reports. Methods. We used a three-phase consensus process consisting of (1) pre-meeting literature review and interviews to generate items for the reporting guidelines, (2) a face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the reporting guidelines, and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines. Results: This consensus process involved 27 participants and resulted in a 13-item checklist - a reporting guideline for case reports. The primary items of the checklist are title, key words, abstract, introduction, patient information, clinical findings, timeline, diagnostic assessment, therapeutic interventions, follow-up and outcomes, discussion, patient perspective, and informed consent. Conclusions: We believe the implementation of the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines by medical journals will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports will inform clinical study design, provide early signals of effectiveness and harms, and improve healthcare delivery.
AB - Background: A case report is a narrative that describes, for medical, scientific, or educational purposes, a medical problem experienced by one or more patients. Case reports written without guidance from reporting standards are insufficiently rigorous to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. Primary Objective. Develop, disseminate, and implement systematic reporting guidelines for case reports. Methods. We used a three-phase consensus process consisting of (1) pre-meeting literature review and interviews to generate items for the reporting guidelines, (2) a face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the reporting guidelines, and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines. Results: This consensus process involved 27 participants and resulted in a 13-item checklist - a reporting guideline for case reports. The primary items of the checklist are title, key words, abstract, introduction, patient information, clinical findings, timeline, diagnostic assessment, therapeutic interventions, follow-up and outcomes, discussion, patient perspective, and informed consent. Conclusions: We believe the implementation of the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines by medical journals will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports will inform clinical study design, provide early signals of effectiveness and harms, and improve healthcare delivery.
KW - Case report
KW - Case study
KW - EQUATOR Network
KW - Health research reporting guidelines
KW - Meaningful use
KW - Patient reports
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884315841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1752-1947-7-223
DO - 10.1186/1752-1947-7-223
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84884315841
SN - 1752-1947
VL - 7
JO - Journal of Medical Case Reports
JF - Journal of Medical Case Reports
M1 - 223
ER -