The arbitrary magic of p<0.05: Beyond statistics

Constantinos E. Alifieris, Eleni Souferi-Chronopoulou, Dimitrios T. Trafalis, Antonios Arvelakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Modern research and scientific conclusions are widely regarded as valid when the study design and analysis are interpreted correctly. P-value is considered to be the most commonly used method to provide a dichotomy between true and false data in evidence-based medicine. However, many authors, reviewers and editors may be unfamiliar with the true definition and correct interpretation of this number. This article intends to point out how misunderstanding or misuse of this value can have an impact in both the scientific community as well as the society we live in. The foundation of the medical education system rewards the abundance of scientific papers rather than the careful search of the truth. Appropriate research ethics should be practised in all stages of the publication process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-593
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of B.U.ON.
Volume25
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Biostatistics
  • Ethics
  • Medical reversal
  • Statistics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The arbitrary magic of p<0.05: Beyond statistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this