TY - JOUR
T1 - The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain
AU - Sayed, Dawood
AU - Grider, Jay
AU - Strand, Natalie
AU - Hagedorn, Jonathan M.
AU - Falowski, Steven
AU - Lam, Christopher M.
AU - Francio, Vinicius Tieppo
AU - Beall, Douglas P.
AU - Tomycz, Nestor D.
AU - Davanzo, Justin R.
AU - Aiyer, Rohit
AU - Lee, David W.
AU - Kalia, Hemant
AU - Sheen, Soun
AU - Malinowski, Mark N.
AU - Verdolin, Michael
AU - Vodapally, Shashank
AU - Carayannopoulos, Alexios
AU - Jain, Sameer
AU - Azeem, Nomen
AU - Tolba, Reda
AU - Chien, George C.Chang
AU - Ghosh, Priyanka
AU - Mazzola, Anthony J.
AU - Amirdelfan, Kasra
AU - Chakravarthy, Krishnan
AU - Petersen, Erika
AU - Schatman, Michael E.
AU - Deer, Timothy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Sayed et al.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Objective: The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Methods: The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented. Results: After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain. Conclusion: The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.
AB - Introduction: Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Objective: The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Methods: The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented. Results: After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain. Conclusion: The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.
KW - back pain
KW - clinical guideline
KW - epidural steroid injection
KW - intervention
KW - lumbar disorder
KW - minimally invasive spine procedure
KW - radiofrequency ablation
KW - spinal cord stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146975439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/JPR.S386879
DO - 10.2147/JPR.S386879
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85146975439
SN - 1178-7090
VL - 15
SP - 3729
EP - 3832
JO - Journal of Pain Research
JF - Journal of Pain Research
ER -