TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing mutual exclusivity of ETS rearranged prostate cancer
AU - Svensson, Maria A.
AU - Lafargue, Christopher J.
AU - MacDonald, Theresa Y.
AU - Pflueger, Dorothee
AU - Kitabayashi, Naoki
AU - Santa-Cruz, Ashley M.
AU - Garsha, Karl E.
AU - Sathyanarayana, Ubaradka G.
AU - Riley, Janice P.
AU - Yun, Chol S.
AU - Nagy, Dea
AU - Kosmeder, Jerry W.
AU - Pestano, Gary A.
AU - Tewari, Ashutosh K.
AU - Demichelis, Francesca
AU - Rubin, Mark A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Dr Arul Chinnaiyan for providing additional BAC clones and Dr Sven Perner for evaluating the cases for the TMA construction and assisting with parts of the FISH assessments. Dr David Rickman for helpful comments. Paul Chadwick at the Translational Research Program, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College for TMA construction. Dr Raquel Esgueva for helping with parts of the FISH evaluations. This study was supported by NCI grant CA125612 (FD and MAR) and CA116337 (FD and MAR).
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Prostate cancer is a clinically heterogeneous and multifocal disease. More than 80% of patients with prostate cancer harbor multiple geographically discrete cancer foci at the time of diagnosis. Emerging data suggest that these foci are molecularly distinct consistent with the hypothesis that they arise as independent clones. One of the strongest arguments is the heterogeneity observed in the status of E26 transformation specific (ETS) rearrangements between discrete tumor foci. The clonal evolution of individual prostate cancer foci based on recent studies demonstrates intertumoral heterogeneity with intratumoral homogeneity. The issue of multifocality and interfocal heterogeneity is important and has not been fully elucidated due to lack of the systematic evaluation of ETS rearrangements in multiple tumor sites. The current study investigates the frequency of multiple gene rearrangements within the same focus and between different cancer foci. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were designed to detect the four most common recurrent ETS gene rearrangements. In a cohort of 88 men with localized prostate cancer, we found ERG, ETV1, and ETV5 rearrangements in 51% (44/86), 6% (5/85), and 1% (1/86), respectively. None of the cases demonstrated ETV4 rearrangements. Mutual exclusiveness of ETS rearrangements was observed in the majority of cases; however, in six cases, we discovered multiple ETS or 5′ fusion partner rearrangements within the same tumor focus. In conclusion, we provide further evidence for prostate cancer tumor heterogeneity with the identification of multiple concurrent gene rearrangements.
AB - Prostate cancer is a clinically heterogeneous and multifocal disease. More than 80% of patients with prostate cancer harbor multiple geographically discrete cancer foci at the time of diagnosis. Emerging data suggest that these foci are molecularly distinct consistent with the hypothesis that they arise as independent clones. One of the strongest arguments is the heterogeneity observed in the status of E26 transformation specific (ETS) rearrangements between discrete tumor foci. The clonal evolution of individual prostate cancer foci based on recent studies demonstrates intertumoral heterogeneity with intratumoral homogeneity. The issue of multifocality and interfocal heterogeneity is important and has not been fully elucidated due to lack of the systematic evaluation of ETS rearrangements in multiple tumor sites. The current study investigates the frequency of multiple gene rearrangements within the same focus and between different cancer foci. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were designed to detect the four most common recurrent ETS gene rearrangements. In a cohort of 88 men with localized prostate cancer, we found ERG, ETV1, and ETV5 rearrangements in 51% (44/86), 6% (5/85), and 1% (1/86), respectively. None of the cases demonstrated ETV4 rearrangements. Mutual exclusiveness of ETS rearrangements was observed in the majority of cases; however, in six cases, we discovered multiple ETS or 5′ fusion partner rearrangements within the same tumor focus. In conclusion, we provide further evidence for prostate cancer tumor heterogeneity with the identification of multiple concurrent gene rearrangements.
KW - ETS (E26 transformation specific) rearrangements
KW - TMPRSS2-ERG
KW - heterogeneity
KW - prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651498273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/labinvest.2010.179
DO - 10.1038/labinvest.2010.179
M3 - Article
C2 - 20975660
AN - SCOPUS:78651498273
SN - 0023-6837
VL - 91
SP - 404
EP - 412
JO - Laboratory Investigation
JF - Laboratory Investigation
IS - 3
ER -