Ten Years’ Experience With Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Carlos Rotellar, John Black, James F. Winchester, Thomas A. Rakowski, Winnie F. Mosher, Mary Jane Mazzoni, Marylynn Amiranzavi, Vincent Garagusi, Mohammad R. Alijani, William P. Argy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Up to January 1989, 171 patients were trained at our center on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and 17 on continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Over 10 years, we have gained 5,068 patient-months experience. Patient survival was 60% and 31% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In contrast, diabetics had a survival of 32% at 5 years. Major complications included 499 new episodes of peritonitis, 304 exit-site infections, 22 hernias, five bowel perforations, one hydrothorax, and three episodes of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis. Our technique survival has been 62% and 40% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. We believe that CAPD is a viable dialysis technique for long-term treatment of chronic renal failure and it should be offered as an option to intermittent hemodialysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-164
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Peritoneal dialysis
  • continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
  • dialysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten Years’ Experience With Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this