Technical advances in total aortic arch replacement

Background. We compared the effects of using hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) alone, HCA combined with selective cerebral perfusion (SCP), and use of SCP with a trifurcated graft (T) on outcome after aortic arch repair. Methods. One hundred fifty patients, median age 66 years (range, 27 to 85), underwent total arch replacement between 1988 and 2002; 75 were female. We retrospectively compared the results of three patient groups roughly comparable with regard to preoperative risk factors: 45 patients using HCA beginning in 1988; 67 patients using HCA/SCP beginning in 1994; and 38 patients utilizing a trifurcated arch graft in conjunction with SCP through the axillary artery (HCA/SCP/T) since 2000. The groups were well matched with regard to median age (66, 68, and 66 years), urgency (emergent 11%, 13%, 5%; urgent 24%, 9%, 18%; and elective 64%, 78%, 76%), and several other known risk factors (p = not significant). Results. An adverse outcome - hospital death or permanent stroke - occurred in 14%: in 16% with HCA, in 16% with HCA/SCP, and in 8% with HCA/SCP/T. Transient neurologic dysfunction among patients surviving without stroke was lower with HCA/SCP/T (11%) than with HCA (33%) or HCA/SCP (17%). Mean duration of HCA was 52 ± 16 minutes with HCA alone versus 45 ± 10 minutes with HCA/SCP and 31 ± 7 minutes with HCA/SCP/T (p < 0.0001 for groups HCA and HCA/SCP combined versus HCA/SCP/T). Mean duration of SCP was 57 ± 25 minutes with HCA/SCP versus 62 ± 24 minutes with HCA/SCP/T (p = not significant). Comparison of the groups of patients who had comparable preoperative risk factors for adverse outcome showed a trend toward lower adverse outcome and transient neurologic dysfunction rates using HCA/SCP/T; a significant reduction in respiratory (p < 0.001), infectious (p = 0.015) and cardiac (p = 0.005) complications in HCA/SCP/T compared with the earlier groups; and significantly shorter durations of intensive care (p < 0.0001) and hospitalization (p = 0.004). Conclusions. Our results suggest that HCA/SCP is superior to HCA alone for preventing cerebral injury during operations on the aortic arch. By further reducing embolic risk as well as duration of HCA, HCA/SCP/T with axillary artery cannulation may be the optimal technique for averting adverse outcomes, reducing complications, and shortening hospital stay after aortic arch repair.