TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of frequency of felt and enacted stigma in epilepsy and determining factors and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy—Report from the International League Against Epilepsy Task Force on Stigma in Epilepsy
AU - Kwon, Churl Su
AU - Jacoby, Ann
AU - Ali, Amza
AU - Austin, Joan
AU - Birbeck, Gretchen L.
AU - Braga, Patricia
AU - Cross, J. Helen
AU - de Boer, Hanneke
AU - Dua, Tarun
AU - Fernandes, Paula T.
AU - Fiest, Kirsten M.
AU - Goldstein, Jonathan
AU - Haut, Sheryl
AU - Lorenzetti, Diane
AU - Mifsud, Janet
AU - Moshe, Solomon
AU - Parko, Karen L.
AU - Tripathi, Manjari
AU - Wiebe, Samuel
AU - Jette, Nathalie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International League Against Epilepsy
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objective: To review the evidence of felt and enacted stigma and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy, and their determining factors. Methods: Thirteen databases were searched (1985–2019). Abstracts were reviewed in duplicate and data were independently extracted using a standardized form. Studies were characterized using descriptive analysis by whether they addressed “felt” or “enacted” stigma and “attitudes” toward persons living with epilepsy. Results: Of 4234 abstracts, 132 met eligibility criteria and addressed either felt or enacted stigma and 210 attitudes toward epilepsy. Stigma frequency ranged broadly between regions. Factors associated with enacted stigma included low level of knowledge about epilepsy, lower educational level, lower socioeconomic status, rural areas living, and religious grouping. Negative stereotypes were often internalized by persons with epilepsy, who saw themselves as having an “undesirable difference” and so anticipated being treated differently. Felt stigma was associated with increased risk of psychological difficulties and impaired quality of life. Felt stigma was linked to higher seizure frequency, recency of seizures, younger age at epilepsy onset or longer duration, lower educational level, poorer knowledge about epilepsy, and younger age. An important finding was the potential contribution of epilepsy terminology to the production of stigma. Negative attitudes toward those with epilepsy were described in 100% of included studies, and originated in any population group (students, teachers, healthcare professionals, general public, and those living with epilepsy). Better attitudes were generally noted in those of younger age or higher educational status. Significance: Whatever the specific beliefs about epilepsy, implications for felt and enacted stigma show considerable commonality worldwide. Although some studies show improvement in attitudes toward those living with epilepsy over time, much work remains to be done to improve attitudes and understand the true occurrence of discrimination against persons with epilepsy.
AB - Objective: To review the evidence of felt and enacted stigma and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy, and their determining factors. Methods: Thirteen databases were searched (1985–2019). Abstracts were reviewed in duplicate and data were independently extracted using a standardized form. Studies were characterized using descriptive analysis by whether they addressed “felt” or “enacted” stigma and “attitudes” toward persons living with epilepsy. Results: Of 4234 abstracts, 132 met eligibility criteria and addressed either felt or enacted stigma and 210 attitudes toward epilepsy. Stigma frequency ranged broadly between regions. Factors associated with enacted stigma included low level of knowledge about epilepsy, lower educational level, lower socioeconomic status, rural areas living, and religious grouping. Negative stereotypes were often internalized by persons with epilepsy, who saw themselves as having an “undesirable difference” and so anticipated being treated differently. Felt stigma was associated with increased risk of psychological difficulties and impaired quality of life. Felt stigma was linked to higher seizure frequency, recency of seizures, younger age at epilepsy onset or longer duration, lower educational level, poorer knowledge about epilepsy, and younger age. An important finding was the potential contribution of epilepsy terminology to the production of stigma. Negative attitudes toward those with epilepsy were described in 100% of included studies, and originated in any population group (students, teachers, healthcare professionals, general public, and those living with epilepsy). Better attitudes were generally noted in those of younger age or higher educational status. Significance: Whatever the specific beliefs about epilepsy, implications for felt and enacted stigma show considerable commonality worldwide. Although some studies show improvement in attitudes toward those living with epilepsy over time, much work remains to be done to improve attitudes and understand the true occurrence of discrimination against persons with epilepsy.
KW - enacted stigma
KW - epilepsy terminology
KW - felt stigma
KW - negative attitudes
KW - negative stereotypes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122306980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/epi.17135
DO - 10.1111/epi.17135
M3 - Article
C2 - 34985782
AN - SCOPUS:85122306980
SN - 0013-9580
VL - 63
SP - 573
EP - 597
JO - Epilepsia
JF - Epilepsia
IS - 3
ER -