Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Survivorship and Complications of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Mid-Modular Femoral Stem

  • Aldo M. Riesgo
  • , Jason P. Hochfelder
  • , Edward M. Adler
  • , James D. Slover
  • , Lawrence M. Specht
  • , Richard Iorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1. years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2260-2263
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume30
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Loosening
  • Mid-modular femoral stem
  • Restoration Modular
  • Revision hip arthroplasty
  • Subsidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survivorship and Complications of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Mid-Modular Femoral Stem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this