Abstract
We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1. years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2260-2263 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Arthroplasty |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Loosening
- Mid-modular femoral stem
- Restoration Modular
- Revision hip arthroplasty
- Subsidence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Survivorship and Complications of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Mid-Modular Femoral Stem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver