Survey of the impact of COVID-19 on oncologists' decision making in cancer

Yüksel Ürün, Syed A. Hussain, Ziad Bakouny, Daniel Castellano, Saadettin Kılıçkap, Gilberto Morgan, Rana R. McKay, Kevin Pels, Andrew Schmidt, Deborah B. Doroshow, Fábio Schütz, Laurence Albiges, Gilberto Lopes, James W.F. Catto, Solange Peters, Toni K. Choueiri

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations


PURPOSE To understand readiness measures taken by oncologists to protect patients and health care workers from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and how their clinical decision making was influenced by the pandemic. METHODS An online survey was conducted between March 24 and April 29, 2020. RESULTS A total of 343 oncologists from 28 countries participated. The median age was 43 years (range, 29-68 years), and the majority were male (62%). At the time of the survey, nearly all participants self-reported an outbreak in their country (99.7%). Personal protective equipment was available to all participants, of which surgical mask was the most common (n = 308; 90%). Telemedicine, in the form of phone or video encounters, was common and implemented by 80% (n = 273). Testing patients with cancer for COVID-19 via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction before systemic treatment was not routinely implemented: 58% reported no routine testing, 39% performed testing in selected patients, and 3% performed systematic testing in all patients. The most significant factors influencing an oncologist's decision making regarding choice of systemic therapy included patient age and comorbidities (81% and 92%, respectively). Although hormonal treatments and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were considered to be relatively safe, cytotoxic chemotherapy and immune therapies were perceived as being less safe or unsafe by participants. The vast majority of participants stated that during the pandemic they would use less chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and steroids. Although treatment in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and first-line metastatic disease was less affected, most of the participants stated that they would be more hesitant to recommend second- or third-line therapies in metastatic disease. CONCLUSION Decision making by oncologists has been significantly influenced by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1248-1257
Number of pages10
JournalJCO Global Oncology
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Survey of the impact of COVID-19 on oncologists' decision making in cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this