TY - JOUR
T1 - Survey of current functional outcomes assessment practices in patients with head and neck cancer
T2 - Initial project of the head and neck research network
AU - Rieger, Jana M.
AU - Lam Tang, Judith A.
AU - Harris, Jeffrey
AU - Seikaly, Hadi
AU - Wolfaardt, Johan
AU - Glaum, Ricarda
AU - Schmelzeisen, Rainer
AU - Buchbinder, Daniel
AU - Jacobson, Adam
AU - Lazarus, Cathy
AU - Markowitz, Erika
AU - Okay, Devin
AU - Urken, Mark
AU - Aitasalo, Kalle
AU - Happonen, Risto Pekka
AU - Kinnunen, Ilpo
AU - Laine, Juhani
AU - Soukka, Tero
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Background: Functional outcomes assessment has become increasingly important in informing treatment decisions in the area of head and neck cancer. However, consistency of assessment methods across studies has been lacking. For the literature to inform clinical decision making, consensus regarding outcomes measurements is necessary. Objective: The Head and Neck Research Network (HNRN) was founded in January 2008 to become a conduit for high-quality research in the area of functional outcomes in patients with head and neck defects. The present study surveyed experts in functional outcomes assessment to determine what are considered the most important tools for assessing speech and swallowing and what background patient characteristics are important to capture. Design, Participants, and Measures : Respondents to the online survey included 54 participants with a background in speech-language pathology, with the majority of respondents from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Results and Conclusions: The results from the survey indicated that clinicians consider both subjective and objective measures as important to use when assessing function. More advanced technical tools were often rated as less important; however, it also was noted that clinicians were most often not able to access these tools or were unfamiliar with them.
AB - Background: Functional outcomes assessment has become increasingly important in informing treatment decisions in the area of head and neck cancer. However, consistency of assessment methods across studies has been lacking. For the literature to inform clinical decision making, consensus regarding outcomes measurements is necessary. Objective: The Head and Neck Research Network (HNRN) was founded in January 2008 to become a conduit for high-quality research in the area of functional outcomes in patients with head and neck defects. The present study surveyed experts in functional outcomes assessment to determine what are considered the most important tools for assessing speech and swallowing and what background patient characteristics are important to capture. Design, Participants, and Measures : Respondents to the online survey included 54 participants with a background in speech-language pathology, with the majority of respondents from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Results and Conclusions: The results from the survey indicated that clinicians consider both subjective and objective measures as important to use when assessing function. More advanced technical tools were often rated as less important; however, it also was noted that clinicians were most often not able to access these tools or were unfamiliar with them.
KW - Functional outcomes
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Speech
KW - Swallowing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957200513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2310/7070.2010.090339
DO - 10.2310/7070.2010.090339
M3 - Article
C2 - 20828515
AN - SCOPUS:77957200513
SN - 1916-0208
VL - 39
SP - 523
EP - 531
JO - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 5
ER -