Surgical checklists: A detailed review of their emergence, development, and relevance to neurosurgical practice

Douglas J. McConnell, Kyle M. Fargen, J. Mocco

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the fall of 1999, the Institute of Medicine released "To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System," a sobering report on the safety of the American healthcare industry. This work and others like it have ushered in an era where the science of quality assurance has quickly become an integral facet of the practice of medicine. One critical component of this new era is the development, application, and refinement of checklists. In a few short years, the checklist has evolved from being perceived as an assault on the practitioners' integrity to being welcomed as an important tool in reducing complications and preventing medical errors. In an effort to further expand the neurosurgical community's acceptance of surgical checklists, we review the rationale behind checklists, discuss the history of medical and surgical checklists, and remark upon the future of checklists within our field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number92163
JournalSurgical Neurology International
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Checklist
  • complications
  • medical errors
  • neurosurgery
  • surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical checklists: A detailed review of their emergence, development, and relevance to neurosurgical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this