Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Supraventricular Arrhythmia Following Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure

  • Paul Guedeney
  • , Mikael Laredo
  • , Michel Zeitouni
  • , Marie Hauguel-Moreau
  • , Thomas Wallet
  • , Benjamin Elegamandji
  • , Sonia Alamowitch
  • , Sophie Crozier
  • , Candice Sabben
  • , Sandrine Deltour
  • , Michaël Obadia
  • , Nadia Benyounes
  • , Jean Philippe Collet
  • , Stéphanie Rouanet
  • , Nadjib Hammoudi
  • , Johanne Silvain
  • , Gilles Montalescot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Randomized studies have reported low rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure (<6%) but have relied on patient-reported symptomatic episodes, so the true incidence and timing of AF after PFO closure remain unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the incidence, timing, and determinants of supraventricular arrhythmia following PFO closure on the basis of loop recorder monitoring. Methods: Cardiac monitoring was proposed to all patients after PFO closure from June 2018 to October 2021 at a single center by means of implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients considered at higher risk for AF (age ≥ 55 years, associated cardiovascular risk factors, prior palpitations, or documented supraventricular ectopic activity) or 4-week external loop recorder monitoring in other patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AF, atrial flutter, or supraventricular tachycardia lasting >30 seconds within 28 days of the procedure. Determinants of the primary endpoint were assessed using a stepwise logistic regression model. Results: A total of 225 patients were included. The primary endpoint occurred in 47 patients (20.9%), including 13 (9.9%) and 24 (28.9%) among patients monitored with external loop recorders and implantable loop recorders, respectively. Overall, the median delay from procedure to arrhythmia was 14.0 days (IQR: 6.5-19.0 days), and one-half of these patients reported symptomatic episodes. Determinants of the primary endpoint were older age (adjusted OR: 1.67 per 10-year increase; 95% CI: 1.18-2.36), device left disc diameter ≥25 mm (adjusted OR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.19-5.98) and male sex (adjusted OR: 4.78; 95% CI: 1.96-11.66). Conclusions: Using loop recorder monitoring for ≥28 days, supraventricular arrhythmia was diagnosed in 1 in 5 patients, with a median delay of 14 days, suggesting that this postprocedural event has so far been underestimated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2315-2322
Number of pages8
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume15
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • patent foramen ovale
  • stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supraventricular Arrhythmia Following Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this