TY - JOUR
T1 - Subspecialty and Training Preferences for U.S. Neurosurgery Faculty with International Training
AU - Li, Adam Y.
AU - Kalagara, Roshini
AU - Asfaw, Zerubabbel
AU - Schupper, Alexander J.
AU - Siddiqui, Faizaan
AU - Hannah, Theodore C.
AU - Quinones, Addison
AU - McCarthy, Lily
AU - Genadry, Lisa
AU - Germano, Isabelle M.
AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Peter Christopher and Alden Weiner for help with data collection. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background: Academic neurosurgeons with international medical training play a large role in the U.S. neurosurgical workforce. We aimed to compare U.S.-trained neurosurgeons with internationally trained neurosurgeons to reveal differences in subspecialty preferences and training opportunities abroad. Methods: We identified 1671 neurosurgeons from 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited neurosurgical residency programs. Data on demographics, institution characteristics, and chosen subspecialty were collected, and faculty were divided based on location of training. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression compared faculty characteristics between training locations. Results: Compared with the U.S. medical school + U.S. residency group, the international medical graduate + U.S. residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base and vascular neurosurgery and complete a fellowship in the United States or internationally (P < 0.05). The international medical graduate + international residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base neurosurgery, more likely to complete an international fellowship, and less likely to practice general neurosurgery (P < 0.05). Neurosurgeons in pediatrics, radiosurgery, and vascular subspecialties were more likely to receive fellowship training in any location (P < 0.05). Additionally, functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete fellowships internationally, spinal neurosurgeons were less likely to pursue international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons were more likely to have dual fellowship training in both the United States and abroad (P < 0.05). Conclusions: International medical training affected subspecialty choice and fellowship training. Internationally trained neurosurgeons more often specialized in oncology and vascular neurosurgery. Functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete international fellowships, spine neurosurgeons were less likely to complete international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons more often had both U.S. and international fellowships.
AB - Background: Academic neurosurgeons with international medical training play a large role in the U.S. neurosurgical workforce. We aimed to compare U.S.-trained neurosurgeons with internationally trained neurosurgeons to reveal differences in subspecialty preferences and training opportunities abroad. Methods: We identified 1671 neurosurgeons from 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited neurosurgical residency programs. Data on demographics, institution characteristics, and chosen subspecialty were collected, and faculty were divided based on location of training. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression compared faculty characteristics between training locations. Results: Compared with the U.S. medical school + U.S. residency group, the international medical graduate + U.S. residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base and vascular neurosurgery and complete a fellowship in the United States or internationally (P < 0.05). The international medical graduate + international residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base neurosurgery, more likely to complete an international fellowship, and less likely to practice general neurosurgery (P < 0.05). Neurosurgeons in pediatrics, radiosurgery, and vascular subspecialties were more likely to receive fellowship training in any location (P < 0.05). Additionally, functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete fellowships internationally, spinal neurosurgeons were less likely to pursue international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons were more likely to have dual fellowship training in both the United States and abroad (P < 0.05). Conclusions: International medical training affected subspecialty choice and fellowship training. Internationally trained neurosurgeons more often specialized in oncology and vascular neurosurgery. Functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete international fellowships, spine neurosurgeons were less likely to complete international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons more often had both U.S. and international fellowships.
KW - Academic neurosurgery
KW - International fellowship
KW - International medical school
KW - International residency
KW - Neurosurgery subspecialties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130486237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.105
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.105
M3 - Article
C2 - 35513280
AN - SCOPUS:85130486237
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 164
SP - e326-e334
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -