Structure‐activity studies of the s‐echistatin inhibition of bone resorption

Masahiko Sato, Victor Garsky, Robert J. Majeska, Thomas A. Einhorn, John Murray, Armen H. Tashjian, Robert J. Gould

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations


Synthetic Arg‐Gly‐Asp (RGD)‐containing peptides were examined in bone resorption or attachment and detachment assays with isolated mammalian osteoclasts in an effort to elucidate the mechanistic and structural basis for the inhibition of bone resorption by s‐echistatin. Bone resorption was the process most sensitive to inhibition by s‐echistatin, with IC50 = 0.3 nM; inhibition of attachment to bone or detachment (lamellipodial retraction) was 30‐ to 70‐fold less sensitive, with IC50 = 10 or 20 nM, respectively. Single amino acid substitutions within the 49‐residue sequence of s‐echistatin showed that although the efficacy of s‐echistatin is dependent on the Arg24‐Gly25‐Asp26 sequence, additional residues, including Asp27, Met28, and Cys39, are also critical for potent inhibition of the resorbing activity of isolated rat osteoclasts. Because of the identification of the avβ3 as the primary integrin on rat osteoclasts interacting the RGD peptides (Helfrich et al.), we examined the possibility of modeling bone resorption with other β3‐mediated processes. Specifically, avβ3 endothelial cell (human or rat) attachment to vitronectin and aIIbβ3 platelet aggregation were compared with bone resorption for sensitivity to s‐echistatin analogs, linear RGD peptides, and cyclic RGD peptides. Essentially no similarity in sensitivity to RGD peptides were observed between bone resorption, platelet aggregation, or endothelial cell attachment. Because rat osteoclasts and human giant cell tumors (osteoclastomas) shared similar sensitivity to s‐echistatin and rat and human endothelial cells showed a similar sensitivity profile to RGD peptides, the dissimilarity of bone resorption to other β3‐mediated processes cannot be explained in terms of species differences. These data show that the osteoclast avβ3 integrin is functionally distinct, despite epitopic similarity to the vitronectin receptor on other cells. Laser scanning confocal and scanning electron micrographs of rat osteoclasts on bone supported the hypothesis that resorption differs from the processes of attachment or detachment from substrates and suggest that inhibition of a minority of integrin‐bone interactions by s‐echistatin is sufficient to inhibit bone resorption. s‐Echistatin was also found to inhibit bone resorption in an organ culture system of neonatal mouse calvariae with IC50 = 1 μM. Taken together, these data show that although it may be possible to target the osteoclast avβ3 integrin for the development of pharmaceuticals, s‐echistatin itself is not useful in this capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1441-1449
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1994


Dive into the research topics of 'Structure‐activity studies of the s‐echistatin inhibition of bone resorption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this