Stressors in 1st-Year Medical School: Comparison of a Conventional and Problem-Based Curriculum

David M. Kaufman, Victor Day, David Mensink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Medical School has been reported by students as being a stressful experience. Purpose: This study addressed the issue of how two radically different curricula affect the stress experienced by medical students. Methods: Students in the final cohort of a conventional lecture-based undergraduate curriculum were compared with students in the first cohort of a new problem-based curriculum, at the end of their 1st year. The responses of students in both groups were compared on a 27-item stressor checklist. Results: The results showed that the ranks of stressors were highly correlated between both curricula. Seven of the top 10 stressors (and the top three stressors) were identical for both groups. There were differences between curricula in the relative frequency of stressors marked. Conclusions: Curriculum differences in 1st-year medical school may not necessarily cause differences in the overall pattern of stressors, although frequency of some stressors may be significantly different.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-194
Number of pages7
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stressors in 1st-Year Medical School: Comparison of a Conventional and Problem-Based Curriculum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this