Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in the Pediatric Population: A Review

Stephen Alerhand, Courtney Cassella, Alex Koyfman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe dermatologic reactions with mucocutaneous involvement that carry elevated mortality rates. They differ along a spectrum of severity based upon body surface area affected. These conditions, usually caused by a drug or infection, are believed to result from cell-mediated and often drug-specific cytotoxic reactions against keratinocytes, leading to widespread dermal-epidermal detachment. Studies attempting to identify potential curative therapies such as intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and corticosteroids remain inconclusive. However, improved outcomes have been demonstrated by early withdrawal of offending medications, early transfer to an intensive care unit or burn unit, and aggressive supportive care. Due to the rare incidence of SJS and TEN, its recurrence among survivors hints at future vulnerability for these patients, and notorious offending medications should thus be avoided. This clinical review will highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges posed by SJS and TEN, while emphasizing the need to maintain them high on the emergency medicine physician's differential. The review will also detail the supportive measures to take for preventing the rapid progression of mucocutaneous complications and subsequent sepsis-related mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-478
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • ALDEN
  • RegiSCAR
  • SCORTEN
  • Stevens-Johnson syndrome
  • dermatologic reactions
  • mucocutaneous reactions
  • toxic epidermal necrolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in the Pediatric Population: A Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this