Statistical modelling of the determinants of historical exposure to bitumen and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among paving workers

Igor Burstyn, Hans Kromhout, Timo Kauppinen, Pirjo Heikkila, Paolo Boffetta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

135 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: An industrial hygiene database has been constructed for the exposure assessment in a study of cancer risk among asphalt workers.Aim: To create models of bitumen and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) exposure intensity among paving workers.Methods: Individual exposure measurements from pavers (N=1581) were collected from 8 countries. Correlation patterns between exposure measures were examined and factors affecting exposure were identified using statistical modelling.Results: Inhalable dust appeared to be a good proxy of bitumen fume exposure. Bitumen fume and vapour levels were not correlated. Benzo(a)pyrene level appeared to be a good indicator of PAH exposure. All exposures steadily declined over the last 20 years. Mastic laying, re-paving, surface dressing, oil gravel paving and asphalt temperature were significant determinants of bitumen exposure. Coal tar use dictated PAH exposure levels.Discussion: Bitumen fume, vapour and PAH have different determinants of exposure. For paving workers, exposure intensity can be assessed on the basis of time period and production characteristics. Copyright (C) 2000 British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-56
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Occupational Hygiene
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Asphalt
  • Bitumen
  • Coal tar
  • Database
  • Determinants of exposure
  • Mastic
  • Multicentric study
  • Retrospective exposure assessment
  • Road construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical modelling of the determinants of historical exposure to bitumen and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among paving workers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this