Abstract
Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed to patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis and are often used in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with CKD glomerular filtration rate category 3a (G3a) or worse, including those with kidney failure who are receiving dialysis, clinical practice guidelines suggest “lowering elevated phosphate levels towards the normal range” with possible strategies including dietary phosphate restriction or use of binders. Additionally, guidelines suggest restricting the use of oral elemental calcium often contained in phosphate binders. Nutrition guidelines in CKD suggest <800-1,000 mg of calcium daily, whereas CKD bone and mineral disorder guidelines do not provide clear targets, but <1,500 mg in maintenance dialysis patients has been previously recommended. Many different classes of phosphate binders are now available and clinical trials have not definitively demonstrated the superiority of any class of phosphate binders over another with regard to clinical outcomes. Use of phosphate binders contributes substantially to patients’ pill burden and out-of-pocket costs, and many have side effects. This has led to uncertainty regarding the use and best choice of phosphate binders for patients with CKD or kidney failure. In this controversies perspective, we discuss the evidence base around binder use in CKD and kidney failure with a focus on comparisons of available binders.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 132-141 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | American Journal of Kidney Diseases |
Volume | 77 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2021 |
Keywords
- Phosphate binder
- calcium
- calcium acetate
- chronic kidney disease (CKD)
- dialysis
- ferric citrate
- hemodialysis
- hypercalcemia
- kidney failure
- lanthanum carbonate
- medical nutrition therapy (MNT)
- mortality
- non–calcium-based binder
- phosphorus
- sevelamer
- sucroferric oxyhydroxide