TY - JOUR
T1 - Standard Naloxone Prescribing for Palliative Care Cancer Patients on Opioid Therapy
T2 - A Single-Site Quality Improvement Pilot to Assess Attitudes and Access
AU - Afezolli, Debora
AU - Flemig, David
AU - Easton, Eve
AU - Austin, Vanessa
AU - Scarborough, Bethann
AU - Smith, Cardinale B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Limited data exist on when to offer naloxone to cancer patients on opioid therapy. Measures: We assessed patient and clinician attitudes on naloxone education (done via surveys at initial and follow up visits) and prescribing rates (via chart reviews) at a single ambulatory palliative care practice. Pharmacy records assessed naloxone dispense rates. Intervention: During a three-month period, all new patients receiving opioid therapy were offered naloxone. Standardized educational materials on opioid safety and naloxone use were created and shared by clinical team. Outcomes: Naloxone prescribing rates increased from 5% to 66%. 92% (n = 23) of clinicians reported education/prescribing took ≤ five minutes, and 100% reported either a positive or neutral impact on the encounter. A total of 81% (n = 25) of patients reported no increased worry about opioid use, 68% (n = 21) felt safer with naloxone, and 97% rated the encounter as neutral or positive. 88% (n = 37) of prescriptions were dispensed and 67% of patients (n = 16) paid <$10. Conclusions/Lessons Learned: Opioid safety education and naloxone prescribing can be done quickly and is well-received by clinicians and patients.
AB - Background: Limited data exist on when to offer naloxone to cancer patients on opioid therapy. Measures: We assessed patient and clinician attitudes on naloxone education (done via surveys at initial and follow up visits) and prescribing rates (via chart reviews) at a single ambulatory palliative care practice. Pharmacy records assessed naloxone dispense rates. Intervention: During a three-month period, all new patients receiving opioid therapy were offered naloxone. Standardized educational materials on opioid safety and naloxone use were created and shared by clinical team. Outcomes: Naloxone prescribing rates increased from 5% to 66%. 92% (n = 23) of clinicians reported education/prescribing took ≤ five minutes, and 100% reported either a positive or neutral impact on the encounter. A total of 81% (n = 25) of patients reported no increased worry about opioid use, 68% (n = 21) felt safer with naloxone, and 97% rated the encounter as neutral or positive. 88% (n = 37) of prescriptions were dispensed and 67% of patients (n = 16) paid <$10. Conclusions/Lessons Learned: Opioid safety education and naloxone prescribing can be done quickly and is well-received by clinicians and patients.
KW - Naloxone
KW - cancer pain
KW - opioid overdose prevention
KW - opioid risk assessment
KW - safe opioid prescribing
KW - supportive oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146124027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 36586519
AN - SCOPUS:85146124027
SN - 0885-3924
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
ER -