Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Specificity of the American Urological Association voiding symptom index: Comparison of unselected and selected samples of both sexes

  • T. C. Chai
  • , W. D. Belville
  • , E. J. McGuire
  • , L. Nyquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

171 Scopus citations

Abstract

The American Urological Association voiding symptom index questionnaire for benign prostatic hypertrophy was administered to an elderly unselected sample and a selected urology clinic sample of both sexes to investigate the ability of this instrument to identify prostatic pathological conditions. The female subjects in these cohorts provided a control. In the large unselected sample the male subjects scored statistically higher in only 2 categories, weak stream (487 subjects) and strain (507) (p <0.05 for both categories). The clinical significance of these scores is questionable, however, since they were low (less than 2 of 5). In the selected group (145 subjects) the female subjects showed a higher total mean score due to the contribution of statistically higher irritative scores (p <0.05). We conclude that the American Urological Association voiding symptom index does not specifically identify prostatic pathological conditions, and that elderly men and women have similar voiding symptom scores. Therefore, treatment that results in improvement in symptom scores may not specifically affect the prostate. Other factors, such as an aging detrusor, changes in physiological production of urine or other unknown factors, may contribute to the symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1710-1713
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume150
Issue number5 II
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • diagnosis, differential
  • prostatic diseases
  • prostatic hypertrophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Specificity of the American Urological Association voiding symptom index: Comparison of unselected and selected samples of both sexes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this