Sonohysterographic screening before in vitro fertilization

Alexis H. Kim, Heather McKay, Martin D. Keltz, H. Preston Nelson, G. David Adamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of sonohysterography for uterine screening before IVF. Design: Prospective screening with sonohysterography and comparison with available hysterosalpingographic and hysteroscopic evaluations. Setting: Private practice. Patient(s): Seventy-two women undergoing IVF-ET using their own or donor eggs. Intervention(s): Sonohysterography was performed by instilling saline into the uterine cavity through an intracervical balloon catheter; there was concurrent vaginal sonographic visualization in all cases. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sonohysterographic findings and pregnancy rates. Result(s): Cavitary lesions were detected in 8 (11.1%) of 72 sonohysterographic examinations. Six of 8 cases were confirmed and treated by hysteroscopy. After sonohysterographic evaluation, 35 (48.6%) of 72 patients conceived, resulting in 25 ongoing or delivered pregnancies, 5 chemical pregnancies, and 5 spontaneous abortions. No statistically significant difference was observed in the pregnancy outcome for patients undergoing IVF who had sonohysterography compared with that for patients undergoing IVF during the same period who previously had a uterine evaluation by a different method. The estimated cost savings per patient undergoing sonohysterography instead of in-office hysteroscopy was $275. Conclusion(s): Sonohysterography offers advantages over in-office hysteroscopy and hysterosalpingography for evaluation of the uterus before IVF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841-844
Number of pages4
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Hysterosalpingography
  • Hysteroscopy
  • In vitro fertilization
  • Sonohysterography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sonohysterographic screening before in vitro fertilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this