TY - JOUR
T1 - Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir for previously treated HCV infection
AU - POLARIS-4 Investigators
AU - Bourlière, Marc
AU - Gordon, Stuart C.
AU - Flamm, Steven L.
AU - Cooper, Curtis L.
AU - Ramji, Alnoor
AU - Tong, Myron
AU - Ravendhran, Natarajan
AU - Vierling, John M.
AU - Tran, Tram T.
AU - Pianko, Stephen
AU - Bansal, Meena B.
AU - De Lédinghen, Victor
AU - Hyland, Robert H.
AU - Stamm, Luisa M.
AU - Dvory-Sobol, Hadas
AU - Svarovskaia, Evguenia
AU - Zhang, Jie
AU - Huang, K. C.
AU - Subramanian, G. Mani
AU - Brainard, Diana M.
AU - McHutchison, John G.
AU - Verna, Elizabeth C.
AU - Buggisch, Peter
AU - Landis, Charles S.
AU - Younes, Ziad H.
AU - Curry, Michael P.
AU - Strasser, Simone I.
AU - Schiff, Eugene R.
AU - Reddy, K. Rajender
AU - Manns, Michael P.
AU - Kowdley, Kris V.
AU - Zeuzem, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Bourlière reports receiving grant support, consulting fees, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and AbbVie, consulting fees, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Janssen and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and meeting fees paid for by Genfit and Intercept Pharmaceuticals; Dr. Gordon, receiving grant support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck, grant support, consulting fees, lecture fees, and teaching fees from Intercept and Gilead, grant support from CDC Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, Conatus, CymaBay, and Exalenz, consulting fees from CVS Caremark and Amgen, and fees for serving on a data monitoring board from Tibotec; Dr. Flamm, receiving lecture fees from Gilead, AbbVie, and Merck; Dr. Cooper, receiving grant support, lecture fees and fees for serving as an advisor from Gilead; Dr. Ramji, receiving grant support, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Merck, grant support and fees for serving on an advisory board from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Lupin; Dr. Tong, receiving lecture fees and fees for serving on an advisory board from Gilead Sciences; Dr. Vierling, receiving grant support and fees for serving on an advisory board from Gilead, AbbVie, Merck, Shanghai Sundise Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Janssen; Dr. Tran, receiving grant support, consulting fees, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from AbbVie, Gilead, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Pianko, receiving lecture fees and fees for serving on an advisory board from Gilead, AbbVie, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Dr. de Lédinghen, receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Merck; Drs. Hyland, Stamm, Dvory-Sobol, Svarovskaia, Zhang, Huang, Subramanian, Brainard, and McHutchison, being employed by and holding stock in Gilead Sciences; Dr. Buggisch, receiving lecture fees and fees for serving on an advisory board from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Falk Foundation, Janssen, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Dr. Landis, receiving grant support from AbbVie and Gilead; Dr. Younes, receiving grant support and lecture fees from AbbVie and Gilead and grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Jans-sen, Merck, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Trek Therapeutics; Dr. Curry, receiving grant support, paid to his institution, and travel support from Gilead, and fees for serving on an advisory board from AbbVie and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Strasser, receiving lecture fees, fees for serving on an advisory board, and travel support from Gilead, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck, and lecture fees and fees for serving on an advisory board from Janssen; Dr. Schiff, receiving grant support and fees for serving on an advisory board from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, and Merck, grant support from Orasure Technologies, Discovery Life Sciences, Siemens, MedMira, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, and University of Florida, consulting fees from CVS, and fees for serving on a data monitoring board from Johnson & Johnson; Dr. Reddy, receiving grant support, paid to the University of Pennsylvania, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Vertex, and Janssen, and grant support, paid to the University of Pennsylvania, from Intercept, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, and Conatus Pharmaceuticals; Dr. Manns, receiving grant support, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Novartis, Merck, and AbbVie, and grant support and fees for serving on an advisory board from Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, and Biotest Pharmaceuticals; Dr. Kowdley, receiving grant support and fees for serving on an advisory board from AbbVie, Merck, and Trio Health, and consulting fees, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Gilead Sciences; and Dr. Zeuzem, receiving lecture fees and consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, and Merck. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Background: Patients who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and who do not have a sustained virologic response after treatment with regimens containing direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have limited retreatment options. Methods: We conducted two phase 3 trials involving patients who had been previously treated with a DAA-containing regimen. In POLARIS-1, patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had previously received a regimen containing an NS5A inhibitor were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir, and the protease inhibitor voxilaprevir (150 patients) or matching placebo (150 patients) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who were infected with HCV of other genotypes (114 patients) were enrolled in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir group. In POLARIS-4, patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3 infection who had previously received a DAA regimen but not an NS5A inhibitor were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir (163 patients) or sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (151 patients) for 12 weeks. An additional 19 patients with HCV genotype 4 infection were enrolled in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir group. Results: In the three active-treatment groups, 46% of the patients had compensated cirrhosis. In POLARIS-1, the rate of sustained virologic response was 96% with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir, as compared with 0% with placebo. In POLARIS-4, the rate of response was 98% with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir and 90% with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir. The most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. In the active-treatment groups in both trials, the percentage of patients who discontinued treatment owing to adverse events was 1% or lower. Conclusions: Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir taken for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response among patients across HCV genotypes in whom treatment with a DAA regimen had previously failed.
AB - Background: Patients who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and who do not have a sustained virologic response after treatment with regimens containing direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have limited retreatment options. Methods: We conducted two phase 3 trials involving patients who had been previously treated with a DAA-containing regimen. In POLARIS-1, patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had previously received a regimen containing an NS5A inhibitor were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir, and the protease inhibitor voxilaprevir (150 patients) or matching placebo (150 patients) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who were infected with HCV of other genotypes (114 patients) were enrolled in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir group. In POLARIS-4, patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3 infection who had previously received a DAA regimen but not an NS5A inhibitor were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir (163 patients) or sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (151 patients) for 12 weeks. An additional 19 patients with HCV genotype 4 infection were enrolled in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir group. Results: In the three active-treatment groups, 46% of the patients had compensated cirrhosis. In POLARIS-1, the rate of sustained virologic response was 96% with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir, as compared with 0% with placebo. In POLARIS-4, the rate of response was 98% with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir and 90% with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir. The most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. In the active-treatment groups in both trials, the percentage of patients who discontinued treatment owing to adverse events was 1% or lower. Conclusions: Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir taken for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response among patients across HCV genotypes in whom treatment with a DAA regimen had previously failed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020200062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1613512
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1613512
M3 - Article
C2 - 28564569
AN - SCOPUS:85020200062
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 376
SP - 2134
EP - 2146
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 22
ER -