TY - JOUR
T1 - Sleep medicine in otolaryngology units
T2 - an international survey
AU - Cammaroto, Giovanni
AU - Bianchi, Giulia
AU - Zhang, Henry
AU - Veer, Vik
AU - Kotecha, Bhik
AU - Jacobowitz, Ofer
AU - Llatas, Marina Carrasco
AU - de Apodaca, Paula Martínez Ruiz
AU - Lugo, Rodolfo
AU - Meccariello, Giuseppe
AU - Iannella, Giannicola
AU - Gobbi, Riccardo
AU - Toh, Song Tar
AU - Hsu, Ying Shuo
AU - Baghat, Ahmed Yassin
AU - Lechien, Jerome R.
AU - Calvo-Henriquez, Christian
AU - Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos
AU - Barillari, Maria Rosaria
AU - Ibrahim, Badr
AU - Ayad, Tareck
AU - Fakhry, Nicolas
AU - Hoff, Paul
AU - Thuler, Eric Rodrigues
AU - Chan, Lyndon
AU - Kastoer, Chloe
AU - Ravesloot, Madeline
AU - De Vito, Andrea
AU - Montevecchi, Filippo
AU - Vicini, Claudio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Purpose: No study to date has described the overall landscape of sleep disorders management and training in otolaryngology departments of different countries. The aim of our study was to investigate and compare settings, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and training programmes. Methods: An international online survey was developed with the collaboration of the YO-IFOS (Young Otolaryngologists-International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies) to assess the current practice of otolaryngologists in the management of sleep disorders. The survey also included a session dedicated to training. Results: A total of 126 otolaryngologists completed the survey. The larger part of responses was collected from Central/South America and Europe. The majority of responders from South/Central America (97%) declared to be certified as sleep specialist while 49% of Europeans stated the opposite. Of responders 83% perform a drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) before planning a possible surgical intervention. Soft palate and base of tongue interventions were the most common procedure, respectively performed in 94% and 79% of the cases. Residents were allowed to perform soft palate surgery in 77% of the cases. Upper airway stimulation (26% vs 10%), trans-oral robotic surgery (36% vs 11%) and radiofrequency of the base of the tongue (58% vs 25%) were preferred more frequently by European responders. The highest caseloads of soft palate surgery and bi-maxillary advancement were registered in the academic institutions. Conclusion: Significant concordance and few interesting divergences in diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders were observed between nationalities and types of institution. Economic resources might have played a significant role in the therapeutic choice. Trainees’ lack of exposure to certain interventions and to a sufficient caseload appeared to be the main burden to overcome.
AB - Purpose: No study to date has described the overall landscape of sleep disorders management and training in otolaryngology departments of different countries. The aim of our study was to investigate and compare settings, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and training programmes. Methods: An international online survey was developed with the collaboration of the YO-IFOS (Young Otolaryngologists-International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies) to assess the current practice of otolaryngologists in the management of sleep disorders. The survey also included a session dedicated to training. Results: A total of 126 otolaryngologists completed the survey. The larger part of responses was collected from Central/South America and Europe. The majority of responders from South/Central America (97%) declared to be certified as sleep specialist while 49% of Europeans stated the opposite. Of responders 83% perform a drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) before planning a possible surgical intervention. Soft palate and base of tongue interventions were the most common procedure, respectively performed in 94% and 79% of the cases. Residents were allowed to perform soft palate surgery in 77% of the cases. Upper airway stimulation (26% vs 10%), trans-oral robotic surgery (36% vs 11%) and radiofrequency of the base of the tongue (58% vs 25%) were preferred more frequently by European responders. The highest caseloads of soft palate surgery and bi-maxillary advancement were registered in the academic institutions. Conclusion: Significant concordance and few interesting divergences in diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders were observed between nationalities and types of institution. Economic resources might have played a significant role in the therapeutic choice. Trainees’ lack of exposure to certain interventions and to a sufficient caseload appeared to be the main burden to overcome.
KW - DISE
KW - OSA
KW - Otolaryngology
KW - Sleep surgery
KW - Survey
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85096398374
U2 - 10.1007/s11325-020-02243-6
DO - 10.1007/s11325-020-02243-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33216312
AN - SCOPUS:85096398374
SN - 1520-9512
VL - 25
SP - 2141
EP - 2152
JO - Sleep and Breathing
JF - Sleep and Breathing
IS - 4
ER -