Should we treat acute HIV infection?

Meagan O'Brien, Martin Markowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Critical advances in the early diagnosis of HIV now allow for treatment opportunities during acute infection. It remains unclear whether treatment of acute HIV infection with antiretroviral therapy improves long-term clinical outcomes for the individual and current guidelines are not definitive in recommending therapy at this stage of infection. However, treatment of acute HIV infection may have short-term benefit on viral set point when compared to delayed therapy as well as reducing the risk of transmission to others. Herein we review the immunological and clinical literature to discuss whether we should treat acute HIV infection, both from the perspective of the individual HIV-infected patient and from the public health perspective. As transmission of drug-resistant HIV variants are of concern, we also review recent clinical trial data to provide recommendations for which specific antiretroviral treatment regimens should be considered for the treatment of acute HIV infection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-110
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent HIV/AIDS Reports
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral Therapy
  • Clinical trials
  • Drug-resistant HIV transmission
  • HIV
  • Observational studies
  • Viral load set point
  • Viral reservoir

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should we treat acute HIV infection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this