TY - JOUR
T1 - Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease
AU - Patel, Nirav C.
AU - Hemli, Jonathan M.
AU - Kim, Michael C.
AU - Seetharam, Karthik
AU - Pirelli, Luigi
AU - Brinster, Derek R.
AU - Scheinerman, S. Jacob
AU - Singh, Varinder P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Objective: We sought to evaluate midterm survival data and resource use for patients who received hybrid coronary revascularization for 2-vessel coronary disease (robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery graft to left anterior descending coronary artery (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass), coupled with a stent to the circumflex or right coronary artery), compared with a concurrent cohort who had traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: A comprehensive retrospective review was undertaken of our prospectively collected database from January 2009 to December 2016. We propensity matched 207 patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eight-year survival data were obtained from the National Death Index. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 1 patient (0.5%) in each of the hybrid coronary revascularization and coronary artery bypass grafting groups. Eight-year survival for the hybrid coronary revascularization group was 187 of 207 patients (90.3%) compared with 182 of 207 patients (87.9%) for the coronary artery bypass grafting cohort. End-stage renal disease independently predicted late mortality in all patients (overall hazard ratio, 5.60, P <.001; hybrid coronary revascularization hazard ratio, 5.58, P =.002; coronary artery bypass grafting hazard ratio, 4.59, P =.006). Female patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization had a higher incidence of late death (hazard ratio, 2.47, P =.05). Length of stay and perioperative transfusion requirements were lower in the hybrid coronary revascularization group (P <.0001). Conclusions: Hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel coronary disease is associated with similar short-term outcomes and intermediate-term survival as traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with lower transfusion requirements and a shorter length of stay than coronary artery bypass grafting.
AB - Objective: We sought to evaluate midterm survival data and resource use for patients who received hybrid coronary revascularization for 2-vessel coronary disease (robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery graft to left anterior descending coronary artery (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass), coupled with a stent to the circumflex or right coronary artery), compared with a concurrent cohort who had traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: A comprehensive retrospective review was undertaken of our prospectively collected database from January 2009 to December 2016. We propensity matched 207 patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eight-year survival data were obtained from the National Death Index. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 1 patient (0.5%) in each of the hybrid coronary revascularization and coronary artery bypass grafting groups. Eight-year survival for the hybrid coronary revascularization group was 187 of 207 patients (90.3%) compared with 182 of 207 patients (87.9%) for the coronary artery bypass grafting cohort. End-stage renal disease independently predicted late mortality in all patients (overall hazard ratio, 5.60, P <.001; hybrid coronary revascularization hazard ratio, 5.58, P =.002; coronary artery bypass grafting hazard ratio, 4.59, P =.006). Female patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization had a higher incidence of late death (hazard ratio, 2.47, P =.05). Length of stay and perioperative transfusion requirements were lower in the hybrid coronary revascularization group (P <.0001). Conclusions: Hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel coronary disease is associated with similar short-term outcomes and intermediate-term survival as traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with lower transfusion requirements and a shorter length of stay than coronary artery bypass grafting.
KW - coronary artery bypass grafts
KW - hybrid coronary revascularization
KW - robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054714732
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.078
DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.078
M3 - Article
C2 - 30119899
AN - SCOPUS:85054714732
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 156
SP - 1799-1807.e3
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 5
ER -