Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease

  • Nirav C. Patel
  • , Jonathan M. Hemli
  • , Michael C. Kim
  • , Karthik Seetharam
  • , Luigi Pirelli
  • , Derek R. Brinster
  • , S. Jacob Scheinerman
  • , Varinder P. Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We sought to evaluate midterm survival data and resource use for patients who received hybrid coronary revascularization for 2-vessel coronary disease (robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery graft to left anterior descending coronary artery (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass), coupled with a stent to the circumflex or right coronary artery), compared with a concurrent cohort who had traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: A comprehensive retrospective review was undertaken of our prospectively collected database from January 2009 to December 2016. We propensity matched 207 patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eight-year survival data were obtained from the National Death Index. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 1 patient (0.5%) in each of the hybrid coronary revascularization and coronary artery bypass grafting groups. Eight-year survival for the hybrid coronary revascularization group was 187 of 207 patients (90.3%) compared with 182 of 207 patients (87.9%) for the coronary artery bypass grafting cohort. End-stage renal disease independently predicted late mortality in all patients (overall hazard ratio, 5.60, P <.001; hybrid coronary revascularization hazard ratio, 5.58, P =.002; coronary artery bypass grafting hazard ratio, 4.59, P =.006). Female patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization had a higher incidence of late death (hazard ratio, 2.47, P =.05). Length of stay and perioperative transfusion requirements were lower in the hybrid coronary revascularization group (P <.0001). Conclusions: Hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel coronary disease is associated with similar short-term outcomes and intermediate-term survival as traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with lower transfusion requirements and a shorter length of stay than coronary artery bypass grafting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1799-1807.e3
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume156
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coronary artery bypass grafts
  • hybrid coronary revascularization
  • robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this