Sex differences in hedonic judgement of odors in schizophrenia cases and healthy controls

Julie Walsh-Messinger, Philip S. Wong, Daniel Antonius, Kevin McMahon, Lewis A. Opler, Paul Michael Ramirez, Dolores Malaspina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The neurocircuitries subserving affective and olfactory processes overlap, are sexually dimorphic, and show disruptions in schizophrenia, suggesting their intersection may be a window on the core process producing psychosis. This study investigated diagnostic and sex differences in hedonic judgments of odors and smell identification in 26 schizophrenia cases and 27 healthy controls. Associations between olfaction measures and psychiatric symptoms were also examined. Cases and controls had similar identification accuracy of unpleasant odors, but cases were significantly less accurate in naming pleasant odors. In cases, greater negative symptom severity was related to abnormal hedonic judgments; specifically, higher pleasantness ratings for unpleasant odors and higher unpleasantness ratings for pleasant odors. Greater positive symptom severity was associated with lower pleasantness ratings for neutral odors. Regarding sex differences, male cases and female controls rated pleasant odors as significantly more unpleasant than male controls. Correlations between depression severity and pleasantness ratings of neutral odors were in opposite directions in male and female cases. These results suggest that a normal sexual dimorphism in the circuitry for hedonic odor judgments may interact with schizophrenia pathology, supporting the utility of olfactory hedonics as a sex-specific biomarker of this pathology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-353
Number of pages9
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume269
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in hedonic judgement of odors in schizophrenia cases and healthy controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this