Abstract
Introduction:It is estimated over 466 million people worldwide have disabling hearing loss, and untreated hearing loss is associated with poorer health outcomes. The influence of sex as a biological variable on hearing loss is not well understood, especially for differences in underlying mechanisms which are typically elucidated through non-clinical research. Although the inclusion of sex as a biological variable in clinical studies has been required since 1993, sex reporting has only been recently mandated in National Institutes of Health funded non-clinical studies.Objective:This article reviews the literature on recent non-clinical and clinical research concerning sex-based differences in hearing loss primarily since 1993, and discusses implications for knowledge gaps in the translation from non-clinical to clinical realms.Conclusions:The disparity between sex-based requirements for non-clinical versus clinical research may inhibit a comprehensive understanding of sex-based mechanistic differences. Such disparities may play a role in understanding and explaining clinically significant sex differences and are likely necessary for developing robust clinical treatment options.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 290-298 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Otology and Neurotology |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Age related hearing loss
- Basic science research
- Clinical research
- Hearing loss
- Noise induced hearing loss
- Non-clinical research
- Otolaryngology
- Sex bias
- Sex differences
- Translational research