Severe ductopenia and cholestasis from levofloxacin drug-induced liver injury: A case report and review

Calley Levine, Anshu Trivedi, Swan N. Thung, Ponni V. Perumalswami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

A 67-year-old woman with hypertension, hypothyroidism, and glaucoma was referred for jaundice and elevated liver function tests. She was treated for streptococcal endophthalmitis with 2 weeks of intravenous (IV) levofloxacin followed by 2 months of oral levofloxacin. The patient had no prior history of liver disease and denied alcohol intake. Her physical exam was remarkable for jaundice and scleral icterus without any stigmata of liver disease. Viral hepatitis serologies and antibodies, including myeloperoxidase, proteinase 3, and antinuclear, antimitochondrial, antiliver kidney microsome, antismooth muscle antibodies, were all within normal limits. The liver biopsy revealed severe cholestasis, extensive bile duct loss, and fibrosis. The patient had no known exposure to any other systemic medications or inciting factors other than levofloxacin. Although there are a few reported cases of drug-induced liver disease (DILI) related to levofloxacin, this case is believed to be the first reported case of ductopenia or vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) associated with levofloxacin. Although fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, are generally considered safe antibiotics, health practitioners must be aware of their association with DILI, as the diagnosis of DILI is one of exclusion and requires a high index of suspicion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-251
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in Liver Disease
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • antibiotics
  • drug-induced liver injury
  • hepatotoxicity
  • levofloxacin
  • vanishing bile duct syndrome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Severe ductopenia and cholestasis from levofloxacin drug-induced liver injury: A case report and review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this