Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of edge recurrence after intracoronary gamma radiation treatment of native artery in-stent restenosis lesions

Javed M. Ahmed, Gary S. Mintz, Ron Waksman, Alexandra J. Lansky, Roxana Mehran, Hongsheng Wu, Neil J. Weissman, Augusto D. Pichard, Lowell F. Satler, Kenneth M. Kent, Martin B. Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST), patients were first treated with conventional techniques and then randomized to either γ-irradiation (192Ir) or placebo (dummy seeds). In the 192Ir group with native coronary in-stent restenosis, we identified 8 patients with edge recurrence and compared them with 21 patients with no recurrence. Serial (postirradiation and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed according to conventional methods. When compared with nonrecurring lesions, lesions with distal edge recurrence had (1) greater decrease in mean distal lumen cross-sectional area (-3.0 ± 1.2 vs -0.7 ± 1.0 mm2, p = 0.0002), (2) no change in mean distal external elastic membrane cross-sectional area versus an increase in mean distal cross-sectional area of 1.0 ± 0.9 mm2 in nonrecurring lesions (p = 0.0047), and (3) a greater increase in mean distal plaque + media cross-sectional area (2.9 ± 1.2 mm vs 1.7 ± 0.6 mm2, p = 0.0103). Within the stented segment, the nonrecurring lesions had no decrease in mean lumen and no increase in mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area. Conversely, lesions with distal edge recurrence had a significant decrease in mean intrastent lumen cross-sectional area (-1.7 ± 1.7 mm2) and a significant increase in mean intrastent intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (1.6 ± 1.6 mm2). Lesions with distal edge recurrence also had a greater decrease in mean proximal lumen cross-sectional area (-1.7 ± 1.3 vs -0.3 ± 0.8 mm2, p = 0.0213), with a trend toward a greater increase in mean proximal plaque + media cross-sectional area. Thus, edge recurrence after 192Ir treatment of in-stent restenosis is the result of neointimal hyperplasia (part of generalized treatment failure) and the absence of radiation-induced positive remodeling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1145-1149
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume87
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 May 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of edge recurrence after intracoronary gamma radiation treatment of native artery in-stent restenosis lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this