TY - JOUR
T1 - Sequential implementation of the EQUIPPED geriatric medication safety program as a learning health system
AU - Vandenberg, Ann E.
AU - Kegler, Michelle
AU - Hastings, Nicole
AU - Hwang, Ula
AU - Wu, Daniel
AU - Stevens, Melissa B.
AU - Clevenger, Carolyn
AU - Eucker, Stephanie
AU - Genes, Nick
AU - Huang, Wennie
AU - Ikpe-Ekpo, Edidiong
AU - Nassisi, Denise
AU - Previll, Laura
AU - Rodriguez, Sandra
AU - Sanon, Martine
AU - Schlientz, David
AU - Vigliotti, Debbie
AU - Vaughan, Camille P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grant R18HS024499 (PI Vaughan) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. We gratefully acknowledge Lucja ´ Bundy, Nicholas Stanley, Luke Waggoner, Janet Wootton and Kayla Burrell for their assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Objectives: To present the three-site EQUIPPED academic health system research collaborative, which engaged in sequential implementation of the EQUIPPED medication safety program, as a learning health system; to understand how the organizations worked together to build resources for program scale-up. Design: Following the Replicating Effective Programs framework, we analyzed content from implementation teams’ focus groups, local and cross-site meeting minutes and sites’ organizational profiles to develop an implementation package. Setting: Three academic emergency departments that each implemented EQUIPPED over three successive years. Participants: Implementation team members at each site participating in focus groups (n = 18), local meetings during implementation years, and cross-site meetings during all years of the projects. Intervention(s): EQUIPPED provides Emergency Department providers with clinical decision support (education, order sets, and feedback) to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications to adults aged 65 years and older who received a prescription at time of discharge. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implementation process components assembled through successive implementation. Results: Each site had clinical and environmental characteristics to be addressed in implementing the EQUIPPED program. We identified 10 process elements and describe lessons for each. Lessons guided the compilation of the EQUIPPED intervention package or toolkit, including the EQUIPPED logic model. Conclusions: Our academic health system research collaborative addressing medication safety through sequential implementation is a learning health system that can serve as a model for other quality improvement projects with multiple sites. The network produced an implementation package that can be vetted, piloted, evaluated, and finalized for large-scale dissemination in community-based settings.
AB - Objectives: To present the three-site EQUIPPED academic health system research collaborative, which engaged in sequential implementation of the EQUIPPED medication safety program, as a learning health system; to understand how the organizations worked together to build resources for program scale-up. Design: Following the Replicating Effective Programs framework, we analyzed content from implementation teams’ focus groups, local and cross-site meeting minutes and sites’ organizational profiles to develop an implementation package. Setting: Three academic emergency departments that each implemented EQUIPPED over three successive years. Participants: Implementation team members at each site participating in focus groups (n = 18), local meetings during implementation years, and cross-site meetings during all years of the projects. Intervention(s): EQUIPPED provides Emergency Department providers with clinical decision support (education, order sets, and feedback) to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications to adults aged 65 years and older who received a prescription at time of discharge. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implementation process components assembled through successive implementation. Results: Each site had clinical and environmental characteristics to be addressed in implementing the EQUIPPED program. We identified 10 process elements and describe lessons for each. Lessons guided the compilation of the EQUIPPED intervention package or toolkit, including the EQUIPPED logic model. Conclusions: Our academic health system research collaborative addressing medication safety through sequential implementation is a learning health system that can serve as a model for other quality improvement projects with multiple sites. The network produced an implementation package that can be vetted, piloted, evaluated, and finalized for large-scale dissemination in community-based settings.
KW - Emergency medicine
KW - Geriatrics
KW - Health services research
KW - Patient safety
KW - Potentially inappropriate medication list
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091602143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa077
DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa077
M3 - Article
C2 - 32671390
AN - SCOPUS:85091602143
SN - 1353-4505
VL - 32
SP - 470
EP - 476
JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
IS - 7
ER -