TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening of newborns for disorders with high benefit- risk ratios should be mandatory
AU - Kelly, Nicole
AU - Makarem, Dalia Chehayeb
AU - Wasserstein, Melissa P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s).
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - Newborn screening has evolved to include an increasingly complex spectrum of diseases, raising concerns that screening should be optional and require parental consent. Early detection of disorders like PKU and MCAD is essential to prevent serious disability and death in affected children. These are examples of high benefit-risk ratio disorders because of the irrefutable health benefits of early detection, coupled with the low risks of treatment. The dire consequences of not diagnosing an infant with a treatable disorder because of parental refusal to screen are wholly unacceptable. Thus, we believe that newborn screening for disorders with high benefit-risk ratios should continue to be mandatory.
AB - Newborn screening has evolved to include an increasingly complex spectrum of diseases, raising concerns that screening should be optional and require parental consent. Early detection of disorders like PKU and MCAD is essential to prevent serious disability and death in affected children. These are examples of high benefit-risk ratio disorders because of the irrefutable health benefits of early detection, coupled with the low risks of treatment. The dire consequences of not diagnosing an infant with a treatable disorder because of parental refusal to screen are wholly unacceptable. Thus, we believe that newborn screening for disorders with high benefit-risk ratios should continue to be mandatory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995681455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1073110516654133
DO - 10.1177/1073110516654133
M3 - Article
C2 - 27338599
AN - SCOPUS:84995681455
SN - 1073-1105
VL - 44
SP - 231
EP - 240
JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
IS - 2
ER -