Safety of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel: Expanded access in North America

  • Anthony M. Joshua
  • , Neal D. Shore
  • , Fred Saad
  • , Kim N. Chi
  • , Carl A. Olsson
  • , Urban Emmenegger
  • , Mark Scholz
  • , William Berry
  • , Som D. Mukherjee
  • , Eric Winquist
  • , Naomi B. Haas
  • , Margaret A. Foley
  • , C. Dmuchowski
  • , Frank Perabo
  • , Mohammad Hirmand
  • , Nahla Hasabou
  • , Dana Rathkopf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND The open-label, single-arm enzalutamide expanded access program (EAP) in the United States and Canada evaluated the safety of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had previously received docetaxel. METHODS Patients (n = 507) received enzalutamide 160 mg/day until disease progression, intolerable adverse events (AEs), or commercial availability occurred. AEs and other safety variables were assessed on day 1, weeks 4 and 12, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Data following transition to commercial drug were not collected. RESULTS Median age was 71 years (range 43-97); 426 patients (83.9%) had a baseline ECOG score of ≤1. In addition to docetaxel, the majority of patients had received prior prostate cancer treatments such as abiraterone (76.1%) or cabazitaxel (28.6%). Median study treatment duration was 2.6 months (range 0.03-9.07). The most frequently reported reasons for discontinuation were commercial availability of enzalutamide (46.7%) and progressive disease (33.7%). A total of 88.2% of patients experienced AEs; 45.4% experienced AEs with a maximum grade of 1 or 2. Fatigue (39.1%), nausea (22.7%), and anorexia (14.8%) were the most commonly reported AEs. Seizure was reported in four patients (0.8%). The most commonly reported event leading to death was progression of metastatic prostate cancer (7.7%). CONCLUSION In this heavily pretreated EAP population with progressive mCRPC, enzalutamide was well tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with that of the AFFIRM trial. Prostate 75: 836-844, 2015.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)836-844
Number of pages9
JournalProstate
Volume75
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • enzalutamide
  • expanded access program
  • metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • safety
  • treatment exposure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel: Expanded access in North America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this